Run 38847780079-validation · validation ✓ Pass

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1182 ms · ~2624 → 122 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1034 ms · ~2624 → 122 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2104 ms · ~2624 → 122 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health (and any non-GET methods) return HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test file test/health.test.mjs includes tests for GET success, POST 405, and other methods 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not describe existing implementation context or how the new helper integrates with current codebase"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (non‑ASCII characters are normalized to ASCII)",
    "slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world' (multiple leading/trailing hyphens are trimmed and collapsed)",
    "slugify('a'.repeat(300)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters (enforces a reasonable maximum length)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (handles undefined input)",
    "slugify('Hello   World') returns 'hello-world' (multiple spaces collapse to a single hyphen)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20645 ms · ~2627 → 168 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not describe existing implementation context or how the new helper integrates with current codebase"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (non‑ASCII characters are normalized to ASCII)","slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world' (multiple leading/trailing hyphens are trimmed and collapsed)","slugify('a'.repeat(300)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters (enforces a reasonable maximum length)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (handles undefined input)","slugify('Hello   World') returns 'hello-world' (multiple spaces collapse to a single hyphen)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not describe existing implementation context or how the new helper integrates with current codebase"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (non‑ASCII characters are normalized to ASCII)",
    "slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world' (multiple leading/trailing hyphens are trimmed and collapsed)",
    "slugify('a'.repeat(300)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters (enforces a reasonable maximum length)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (handles undefined input)",
    "slugify('Hello   World') returns 'hello-world' (multiple spaces collapse to a single hyphen)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 26356 ms · ~2627 → 168 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not describe existing implementation context or how the new helper integrates with current codebase"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (non‑ASCII characters are normalized to ASCII)","slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world' (multiple leading/trailing hyphens are trimmed and collapsed)","slugify('a'.repeat(300)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters (enforces a reasonable maximum length)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (handles undefined input)","slugify('Hello   World') returns 'hello-world' (multiple spaces collapse to a single hyphen)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'",
    "slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world'",
    "slugify('a'.repeat(256)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters",
    "slugify('   ') returns '' (empty string after trimming)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError"
  ]
}

call 1 · 17226 ms · ~2627 → 87 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'","slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world'","slugify('a'.repeat(256)) returns a string no longer than 255 characters","slugify('   ') returns '' (empty string after trimming)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as empty input or multiple colons in a value are not explicitly covered in the acceptance criteria"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the input string \"url: https://x.dev\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"url\" and value \"https://x.dev\"",
    "Given an input string \"key:\" (key with no value), when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"key\" and an empty string value",
    "Given an input string \"path: /api/v1/resource:detail\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"path\" and value \"/api/v1/resource:detail\"",
    "Given an empty string as input, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an empty object",
    "Given a malformed line without a colon, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it throws a ValueError (or returns an error indication)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6551 ms · ~2634 → 227 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as empty input or multiple colons in a value are not explicitly covered in the acceptance criteria"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the input string \"url: https://x.dev\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"url\" and value \"https://x.dev\"","Given an input string \"key:\" (key with no value), when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"key\" and an empty string value","Given an input string \"path: /api/v1/resource:detail\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"path\" and value \"/api/v1/resource:detail\"","Given an empty string as input, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an empty object","Given a malformed line without a colon, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it throws a ValueError (or returns an error indication)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "parseFlatYaml('path: /api/v1/resource') returns { path: '/api/v1/resource' }",
    "parseFlatYaml('key: value:with:colons') returns { key: 'value:with:colons' }",
    "parseFlatYaml('empty:') returns { empty: '' }",
    "parseFlatYaml('  spaced :  value with spaces  ') returns { spaced: 'value with spaces' }",
    "parseFlatYaml('multiple: lines\\nsecond: line') returns { multiple: 'lines', second: 'line' }"
  ]
}

call 1 · 16135 ms · ~2634 → 116 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["parseFlatYaml('path: /api/v1/resource') returns { path: '/api/v1/resource' }","parseFlatYaml('key: value:with:colons') returns { key: 'value:with:colons' }","parseFlatYaml('empty:') returns { empty: '' }","parseFlatYaml('  spaced :  value with spaces  ') returns { spaced: 'value with spaces' }","parseFlatYaml('multiple: lines\\nsecond: line') returns { multiple: 'lines', second: 'line' }"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as empty input or multiple colons in a value are not explicitly covered in the acceptance criteria"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://x.dev')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `url` and value `https://x.dev`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('key:')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `key` and value an empty string `''`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('')`, when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('a: b: c')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `a` and value `b: c`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('key: value')` with existing test suite files unchanged, when the test suite is run, then all existing tests in `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` pass"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20637 ms · ~2634 → 205 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as empty input or multiple colons in a value are not explicitly covered in the acceptance criteria"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://x.dev')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `url` and value `https://x.dev`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('key:')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `key` and value an empty string `''`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('')`, when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('a: b: c')`, when parsed, then it returns an object with key `a` and value `b: c`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('key: value')` with existing test suite files unchanged, when the test suite is run, then all existing tests in `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` pass"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not explicitly covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview",
    "The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly \"Issue Validation\", \"Code Generation\", \"PR Review\", \"Auto-fix\", \"Human Merge\"",
    "Directed edges exist from Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review, with no extra edges",
    "The mermaid block contains no syntax errors; a CI step that validates the markdown renders the diagram successfully",
    "No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the ## Pipeline section and its mermaid block"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21335 ms · ~2649 → 210 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not explicitly covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview","The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly \"Issue Validation\", \"Code Generation\", \"PR Review\", \"Auto-fix\", \"Human Merge\"","Directed edges exist from Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review, with no extra edges","The mermaid block contains no syntax errors; a CI step that validates the markdown renders the diagram successfully","No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the ## Pipeline section and its mermaid block"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not explicitly covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview",
    "The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly \"Issue Validation\", \"Code Generation\", \"PR Review\", \"Auto-fix\", \"Human Merge\"",
    "Directed edges exist from Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review, with no extra edges",
    "The mermaid block contains no syntax errors; a CI step that validates the markdown renders the diagram successfully",
    "No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the ## Pipeline section and its mermaid block"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4872 ms · ~2649 → 210 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not explicitly covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview","The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly \"Issue Validation\", \"Code Generation\", \"PR Review\", \"Auto-fix\", \"Human Merge\"","Directed edges exist from Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review, with no extra edges","The mermaid block contains no syntax errors; a CI step that validates the markdown renders the diagram successfully","No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the ## Pipeline section and its mermaid block"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a `## Pipeline` heading followed immediately by a fenced mermaid code block",
    "The mermaid block renders without errors in GitHub preview (no syntax errors)",
    "The diagram includes exactly five nodes labeled `Issue Validation`, `Code Generation`, `PR Review`, `Auto-fix`, `Human Merge`",
    "Directed edges exist: Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge",
    "No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the `## Pipeline` section"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21667 ms · ~2649 → 166 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a `## Pipeline` heading followed immediately by a fenced mermaid code block","The mermaid block renders without errors in GitHub preview (no syntax errors)","The diagram includes exactly five nodes labeled `Issue Validation`, `Code Generation`, `PR Review`, `Auto-fix`, `Human Merge`","Directed edges exist: Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge","No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the `## Pipeline` section"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that `config/models.yaml` contains the line `validation_max_tokens: 1536` with correct indentation and no trailing spaces",
    "- Assert that calling `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object whose `maxTokens` property equals 1536",
    "- Ensure that all other keys and values in `config/models.yaml` remain unchanged after the modification",
    "- Confirm that loading other model configurations (e.g., `loadLLMConfig('default')`) still returns their original `maxTokens` values",
    "- Run the existing test suite and ensure no tests fail due to the updated `validation_max_tokens` value"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21424 ms · ~2630 → 166 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that `config/models.yaml` contains the line `validation_max_tokens: 1536` with correct indentation and no trailing spaces","- Assert that calling `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object whose `maxTokens` property equals 1536","- Ensure that all other keys and values in `config/models.yaml` remain unchanged after the modification","- Confirm that loading other model configurations (e.g., `loadLLMConfig('default')`) still returns their original `maxTokens` values","- Run the existing test suite and ensure no tests fail due to the updated `validation_max_tokens` value"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which environments or deployment steps need to be updated, missing broader technical context"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that after the change, `config/models.yaml` retains its original formatting and indentation for all other keys",
    "- Ensure that loading the configuration for any other model (e.g., `loadLLMConfig('generation')`) still returns its original `maxTokens` value, confirming no unintended side effects",
    "- Confirm that the repository's CI pipeline runs `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` and all tests pass without modifications to other test files",
    "- Validate that the updated `validation_max_tokens` value is reflected in the generated documentation or README if it references token limits"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20968 ms · ~2630 → 197 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which environments or deployment steps need to be updated, missing broader technical context"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that after the change, `config/models.yaml` retains its original formatting and indentation for all other keys","- Ensure that loading the configuration for any other model (e.g., `loadLLMConfig('generation')`) still returns its original `maxTokens` value, confirming no unintended side effects","- Confirm that the repository's CI pipeline runs `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` and all tests pass without modifications to other test files","- Validate that the updated `validation_max_tokens` value is reflected in the generated documentation or README if it references token limits"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that `config/models.yaml` contains the line `validation_max_tokens: 1536` with correct indentation and no trailing spaces",
    "- Ensure that calling `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object whose `maxTokens` property equals 1536",
    "- Confirm that all other keys and values in `config/models.yaml` remain unchanged after the modification",
    "- Run the existing test suite and ensure no other tests fail due to the updated token limit",
    "- Validate that `loadLLMConfig` for other model names (e.g., `default`, `chat`) still returns their original `maxTokens` values"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3921 ms · ~2630 → 162 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that `config/models.yaml` contains the line `validation_max_tokens: 1536` with correct indentation and no trailing spaces","- Ensure that calling `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object whose `maxTokens` property equals 1536","- Confirm that all other keys and values in `config/models.yaml` remain unchanged after the modification","- Run the existing test suite and ensure no other tests fail due to the updated token limit","- Validate that `loadLLMConfig` for other model names (e.g., `default`, `chat`) still returns their original `maxTokens` values"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a checkpoint file with malformed JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logger.error is called with the file path",
    "Given a missing checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and no warning is logged",
    "Given a checkpoint file containing valid JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns the parsed object unchanged and does not log an error",
    "Given an empty checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs a warning indicating the file is empty",
    "Given a checkpoint file that cannot be read due to permission errors, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error with the file path"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19678 ms · ~2648 → 194 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a checkpoint file with malformed JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logger.error is called with the file path","Given a missing checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and no warning is logged","Given a checkpoint file containing valid JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns the parsed object unchanged and does not log an error","Given an empty checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs a warning indicating the file is empty","Given a checkpoint file that cannot be read due to permission errors, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error with the file path"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a checkpoint file containing malformed JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logger.error is called with the file path",
    "Given a missing checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and does not throw an exception",
    "Given a checkpoint file with valid JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns the parsed object exactly as in the file",
    "Given a checkpoint file that is empty, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error",
    "Given a checkpoint file that the process cannot read due to permission error, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5469 ms · ~2648 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a checkpoint file containing malformed JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logger.error is called with the file path","Given a missing checkpoint file, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and does not throw an exception","Given a checkpoint file with valid JSON, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns the parsed object exactly as in the file","Given a checkpoint file that is empty, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error","Given a checkpoint file that the process cannot read due to permission error, when readCheckpoint is called, then it returns null and logs an error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path",
    "- When the file exists but the process lacks read permissions, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path",
    "- When the file contains valid JSON but includes trailing whitespace, `readCheckpoint` returns the correctly parsed object unchanged",
    "- When `logger.error` is called, it includes the exact error message \"Corrupt checkpoint JSON\" along with the file path"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21203 ms · ~2648 → 148 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path","- When the file exists but the process lacks read permissions, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path","- When the file contains valid JSON but includes trailing whitespace, `readCheckpoint` returns the correctly parsed object unchanged","- When `logger.error` is called, it includes the exact error message \"Corrupt checkpoint JSON\" along with the file path"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings",
    "When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent visits",
    "The dark mode theme must meet WCAG AA contrast ratios for all text and UI elements",
    "If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme without errors",
    "The implementation includes unit tests verifying that the dark mode CSS is applied and that the preference is saved and restored"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19476 ms · ~2541 → 208 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings","When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent visits","The dark mode theme must meet WCAG AA contrast ratios for all text and UI elements","If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme without errors","The implementation includes unit tests verifying that the dark mode CSS is applied and that the preference is saved and restored"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings",
    "When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent loads",
    "The dark mode theme must meet WCAG AA contrast ratios for all text and UI elements",
    "If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme without errors"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19518 ms · ~2541 → 175 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings","When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent loads","The dark mode theme must meet WCAG AA contrast ratios for all text and UI elements","If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme without errors"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback behavior described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings",
    "When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent loads",
    "The UI renders correctly in dark mode on all supported browsers without visual regressions, verified by a screenshot comparison test",
    "If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme and logs a warning"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1785 ms · ~2541 → 191 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no components or files are identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – no error handling or fallback behavior described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings","When the user toggles dark mode, the application persists the preference in local storage and applies it on subsequent loads","The UI renders correctly in dark mode on all supported browsers without visual regressions, verified by a screenshot comparison test","If the system cannot load the dark theme resources, it falls back to the default light theme and logs a warning"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no error or failure scenarios described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "POST /api/login with valid credentials returns HTTP 200 and sets a session cookie",
    "POST /api/login with invalid password returns HTTP 401 and an error message",
    "POST /api/login with missing fields returns HTTP 400 with validation errors",
    "Login request completes within 2 seconds for valid input",
    "Repeated login attempts exceeding rate limit return HTTP 429"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2146 ms · ~2557 → 186 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non‑testable","B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – no error or failure scenarios described"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["POST /api/login with valid credentials returns HTTP 200 and sets a session cookie","POST /api/login with invalid password returns HTTP 401 and an error message","POST /api/login with missing fields returns HTTP 400 with validation errors","Login request completes within 2 seconds for valid input","Repeated login attempts exceeding rate limit return HTTP 429"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable ('Fix the bug', 'It should work correctly')"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue lacks technical context such as affected files or components"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given valid username and password, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned",
    "Given an invalid password, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 401 and an error message is returned",
    "Given missing username or password fields, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 400 with a validation error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4484 ms · ~2557 → 170 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable ('Fix the bug', 'It should work correctly')"],"warnings":["W1: Issue lacks technical context such as affected files or components"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given valid username and password, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned","Given an invalid password, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 401 and an error message is returned","Given missing username or password fields, when POST /api/login is called, then the response status is 400 with a validation error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable and vague",
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable and vague"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which files, modules, or components are affected",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions (e.g., invalid credentials) are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "POST /login with valid credentials returns HTTP 200 and a session token",
    "POST /login with invalid password returns HTTP 401 Unauthorized",
    "POST /login with missing username or password returns HTTP 400 Bad Request"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20803 ms · ~2557 → 150 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable and vague","B2: Acceptance criterion \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable and vague"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which files, modules, or components are affected","W2: No edge cases or error conditions (e.g., invalid credentials) are described"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["POST /login with valid credentials returns HTTP 200 and a session token","POST /login with invalid password returns HTTP 401 Unauthorized","POST /login with missing username or password returns HTTP 400 Bad Request"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 20,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria beyond vague checklist items",
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not reference any affected files beyond the page component, nor describe existing implementation details",
    "W2: No edge cases or error states are described for the redesign"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The Settings page renders with a header element containing the text \"Settings\" and uses the CSS class \"settings-header\"",
    "When a user with no saved preferences visits the Settings page, the default toggle for \"Enable notifications\" is set to off",
    "When a user toggles the \"Dark mode\" switch and saves, the page reloads showing the dark theme and persists the choice in localStorage",
    "The Settings page loads in under 2 seconds on a standard 3G connection for a payload under 500 KB",
    "If the Settings page receives a server error (HTTP 500) while fetching user data, it displays an error banner with the message \"Unable to load settings\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 20309 ms · ~2572 → 309 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria beyond vague checklist items","B2: Acceptance criterion \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable","B2: Acceptance criterion \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable","B2: Acceptance criterion \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not reference any affected files beyond the page component, nor describe existing implementation details","W2: No edge cases or error states are described for the redesign"],"score":20,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The Settings page renders with a header element containing the text \"Settings\" and uses the CSS class \"settings-header\"","When a user with no saved preferences visits the Settings page, the default toggle for \"Enable notifications\" is set to off","When a user toggles the \"Dark mode\" switch and saves, the page reloads showing the dark theme and persists the choice in localStorage","The Settings page loads in under 2 seconds on a standard 3G connection for a payload under 500 KB","If the Settings page receives a server error (HTTP 500) while fetching user data, it displays an error banner with the message \"Unable to load settings\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit, concrete acceptance criteria provided",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable and subjective (\"The page looks modern and clean\",\"Users find it intuitive\",\"It feels responsive\")"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The Settings page renders a header with the text \"Settings\" and a save button aligned to the right",
    "When a user updates a setting and clicks Save, the page displays a success toast with the message \"Settings saved\" within 2 seconds",
    "The Settings page layout adapts to a viewport width of 320px and displays all form fields without horizontal scrolling",
    "If the Settings page receives a server error on load, it shows an error banner with the text \"Failed to load settings\" and a retry button"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3976 ms · ~2572 → 196 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit, concrete acceptance criteria provided","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable and subjective (\"The page looks modern and clean\",\"Users find it intuitive\",\"It feels responsive\")"],"warnings":[],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The Settings page renders a header with the text \"Settings\" and a save button aligned to the right","When a user updates a setting and clicks Save, the page displays a success toast with the message \"Settings saved\" within 2 seconds","The Settings page layout adapts to a viewport width of 320px and displays all form fields without horizontal scrolling","If the Settings page receives a server error on load, it shows an error banner with the text \"Failed to load settings\" and a retry button"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and non-testable",
    "B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and non-testable",
    "B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and non-testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or components besides generic path are referenced",
    "W2: No edge cases or error states are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The Settings page renders without JavaScript errors and matches the design mock at src/designs/settings_mock.png",
    "The Settings page includes a visible Save button with aria-label \"Save settings\"",
    "When a user toggles the \"Enable notifications\" switch, the underlying state updates and the API receives a PATCH request to /api/settings with the correct payload",
    "If the Settings page is loaded on a viewport width of 320px, the layout collapses to a single column and all controls remain accessible"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4001 ms · ~2572 → 238 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and non-testable","B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and non-testable","B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and non-testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or components besides generic path are referenced","W2: No edge cases or error states are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The Settings page renders without JavaScript errors and matches the design mock at src/designs/settings_mock.png","The Settings page includes a visible Save button with aria-label \"Save settings\"","When a user toggles the \"Enable notifications\" switch, the underlying state updates and the API receives a PATCH request to /api/settings with the correct payload","If the Settings page is loaded on a viewport width of 320px, the layout collapses to a single column and all controls remain accessible"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 10,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: AC item \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or code locations beyond the script name are described",
    "W2: No edge cases or performance metrics are specified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` completes execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files",
    "The script logs the total execution time and fails the CI step if it exceeds 2 seconds",
    "When the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it completes in under 0.5 seconds",
    "If the script encounters a file larger than 5 MB, it processes it without exceeding the overall 2‑second limit"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4361 ms · ~2562 → 197 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable","B2: AC item \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or code locations beyond the script name are described","W2: No edge cases or performance metrics are specified"],"score":10,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` completes execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files","The script logs the total execution time and fails the CI step if it exceeds 2 seconds","When the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it completes in under 0.5 seconds","If the script encounters a file larger than 5 MB, it processes it without exceeding the overall 2‑second limit"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 10,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: AC item \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or code locations beyond the script name are described",
    "W2: No edge cases or performance metrics are specified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` completes execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files",
    "The script logs the total execution time and fails the CI step if it exceeds 2 seconds",
    "When the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it completes in under 0.5 seconds",
    "If the script encounters a file larger than 5 MB, it processes it without exceeding the overall 2‑second limit"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2193 ms · ~2562 → 197 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable","B2: AC item \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or code locations beyond the script name are described","W2: No edge cases or performance metrics are specified"],"score":10,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` completes execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files","The script logs the total execution time and fails the CI step if it exceeds 2 seconds","When the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it completes in under 0.5 seconds","If the script encounters a file larger than 5 MB, it processes it without exceeding the overall 2‑second limit"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 40,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"Review should be faster\" is vague and not testable",
    "B2: \"Better performance overall\" is vague and not testable",
    "B3: Scope is ambiguous – no clear definition of which parts of the review process or which scripts need optimization"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which files or components are affected beyond a single script path",
    "W2: No edge cases or measurable performance targets are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The PR review script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` must complete execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files",
    "The script must log the total execution time and the test must assert that it is at least 30% faster than the current baseline measured on the same dataset",
    "If the script encounters a PR with more than 1000 changed files, it must still complete within 5 seconds and return a non‑error exit code"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3864 ms · ~2562 → 226 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"Review should be faster\" is vague and not testable","B2: \"Better performance overall\" is vague and not testable","B3: Scope is ambiguous – no clear definition of which parts of the review process or which scripts need optimization"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which files or components are affected beyond a single script path","W2: No edge cases or measurable performance targets are described"],"score":40,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The PR review script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` must complete execution in under 2 seconds for a PR with up to 500 changed files","The script must log the total execution time and the test must assert that it is at least 30% faster than the current baseline measured on the same dataset","If the script encounters a PR with more than 1000 changed files, it must still complete within 5 seconds and return a non‑error exit code"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 65,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or endpoints should be cached, nor the caching layer or invalidation policy."
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified for where caching should be added.",
    "W2: Edge cases not addressed – no criteria for cache expiration, eviction, or handling of cache misses/errors."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a GET request to /api/data, when the request is made the first time, then the response is stored in the cache and a subsequent identical request returns the cached response within 100ms.",
    "Given a cached entry, when the underlying data changes, then the cache is invalidated and the next request returns the updated data.",
    "Given a request for a non‑cacheable endpoint, when the request is processed, then no cache entry is created and the response is fetched directly from the source."
  ]
}

call 1 · 2787 ms · ~2564 → 235 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or endpoints should be cached, nor the caching layer or invalidation policy."],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified for where caching should be added.","W2: Edge cases not addressed – no criteria for cache expiration, eviction, or handling of cache misses/errors."],"score":65,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a GET request to /api/data, when the request is made the first time, then the response is stored in the cache and a subsequent identical request returns the cached response within 100ms.","Given a cached entry, when the underlying data changes, then the cache is invalidated and the next request returns the updated data.","Given a request for a non‑cacheable endpoint, when the request is processed, then no cache entry is created and the response is fetched directly from the source."]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 35,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and not directly testable (e.g., \"Responses are cached\" lacks specifics)",
    "B3: Scope is ambiguous – it does not specify which responses, endpoints, or components should be cached"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error handling for cache misses are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a GET request to /api/data, when the response is returned, then the response body must be stored in the cache with a TTL of 60 seconds",
    "Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/data within the TTL, when the request is processed, then the service must return the cached response without invoking the downstream data source",
    "Given a GET request to /api/data after the cache TTL has expired, when the request is processed, then the service must fetch a fresh response and update the cache"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5442 ms · ~2564 → 233 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and not directly testable (e.g., \"Responses are cached\" lacks specifics)","B3: Scope is ambiguous – it does not specify which responses, endpoints, or components should be cached"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error handling for cache misses are described"],"score":35,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a GET request to /api/data, when the response is returned, then the response body must be stored in the cache with a TTL of 60 seconds","Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/data within the TTL, when the request is processed, then the service must return the cached response without invoking the downstream data source","Given a GET request to /api/data after the cache TTL has expired, when the request is processed, then the service must fetch a fresh response and update the cache"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or components should be cached, nor any boundaries or configuration details."
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or specific components are identified."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Cache the response of GET /api/items for 5 minutes; subsequent identical requests within that window return the cached payload with HTTP header X-Cache: HIT",
    "Cache miss returns fresh data with HTTP header X-Cache: MISS and stores the result for future requests",
    "Cache entries are evicted after 5 minutes or when the underlying data changes via POST /api/items, causing the next GET to fetch fresh data",
    "Cache failures (e.g., Redis unavailable) fall back to normal processing without raising errors and log a warning",
    "Cache key includes request path and query parameters; requests differing in query parameters are cached separately"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2380 ms · ~2564 → 236 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or components should be cached, nor any boundaries or configuration details."],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or specific components are identified."],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Cache the response of GET /api/items for 5 minutes; subsequent identical requests within that window return the cached payload with HTTP header X-Cache: HIT","Cache miss returns fresh data with HTTP header X-Cache: MISS and stores the result for future requests","Cache entries are evicted after 5 minutes or when the underlying data changes via POST /api/items, causing the next GET to fetch fresh data","Cache failures (e.g., Redis unavailable) fall back to normal processing without raising errors and log a warning","Cache key includes request path and query parameters; requests differing in query parameters are cached separately"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non-testable",
    "B2: \"Metrics can be queried\" is non-testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named",
    "W2: No error or edge cases are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a running service, when the service records a metric, then after restarting the service the stored metric is retrievable via the API endpoint GET /metrics/{id} with HTTP 200 and correct value",
    "Given a running service, when a client calls GET /metrics with query parameters start and end, then the response includes all metrics recorded in that time range and returns HTTP 200",
    "Given no metrics have been recorded, when GET /metrics is called, then the response returns an empty list with HTTP 200",
    "Given the storage backend is PostgreSQL, when the database is unavailable, then POST /metrics returns HTTP 503 with an error message",
    "Given the storage backend is Redis, when the Redis instance is restarted, then previously stored metrics remain available after the restart"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20385 ms · ~2577 → 277 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non-testable","B2: \"Metrics can be queried\" is non-testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named","W2: No error or edge cases are described"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a running service, when the service records a metric, then after restarting the service the stored metric is retrievable via the API endpoint GET /metrics/{id} with HTTP 200 and correct value","Given a running service, when a client calls GET /metrics with query parameters start and end, then the response includes all metrics recorded in that time range and returns HTTP 200","Given no metrics have been recorded, when GET /metrics is called, then the response returns an empty list with HTTP 200","Given the storage backend is PostgreSQL, when the database is unavailable, then POST /metrics returns HTTP 503 with an error message","Given the storage backend is Redis, when the Redis instance is restarted, then previously stored metrics remain available after the restart"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named",
    "W2: No error or edge cases are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a running pipeline, when the service restarts, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the chosen storage backend",
    "Given stored metrics, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics with valid authentication, then the response returns a JSON array containing all metric records with fields id, name, value, timestamp",
    "Given an invalid query parameter to /api/metrics, when the request is made, then the service returns a 400 Bad Request with an error message",
    "Given the storage backend is unavailable, when a metric is recorded, then the service returns a 503 Service Unavailable and does not lose already stored metrics",
    "Given a large volume of metrics (e.g., 10,000 records), when queried, then the response is returned within 2 seconds"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20921 ms · ~2577 → 276 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable","B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named","W2: No error or edge cases are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a running pipeline, when the service restarts, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the chosen storage backend","Given stored metrics, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics with valid authentication, then the response returns a JSON array containing all metric records with fields id, name, value, timestamp","Given an invalid query parameter to /api/metrics, when the request is made, then the service returns a 400 Bad Request with an error message","Given the storage backend is unavailable, when a metric is recorded, then the service returns a 503 Service Unavailable and does not lose already stored metrics","Given a large volume of metrics (e.g., 10,000 records), when queried, then the response is returned within 2 seconds"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete testable statements",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable/subjective",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable/subjective"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named",
    "W2: No error or edge‑case behavior is described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a running service, when the process is stopped and started, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the storage backend",
    "Given a stored metric, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics?name=<metric>, then the response returns a 200 with the correct metric value in JSON",
    "Given no metrics have been recorded, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics, then the response returns an empty list with a 200 status",
    "Given a metric name that does not exist, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics?name=unknown, then the response returns a 404 error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21463 ms · ~2577 → 241 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete testable statements","B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable/subjective","B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable/subjective"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named","W2: No error or edge‑case behavior is described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a running service, when the process is stopped and started, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the storage backend","Given a stored metric, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics?name=<metric>, then the response returns a 200 with the correct metric value in JSON","Given no metrics have been recorded, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics, then the response returns an empty list with a 200 status","Given a metric name that does not exist, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics?name=unknown, then the response returns a 404 error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on a notifier service that is not yet deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which files or modules need to be modified (e.g., the location of pr_review.mjs)"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR review event, when the platform notifier service is available at POST /api/notifier, then pr_review.mjs sends a POST request with JSON body {\"prNumber\": <number>, \"verdict\": \"approved\"|\"changes_requested\"} and receives a 200 OK response",
    "Given the notifier service returns a non‑200 response, then pr_review.mjs logs an error and does not attempt to send a Slack message",
    "Given the notifier service is unavailable (network timeout), then pr_review.mjs retries up to three times before failing gracefully",
    "Given a successful notifier call, then a Slack message is posted to #dev-loop containing the PR number and verdict",
    "Given an invalid payload (missing prNumber or verdict), then the notifier service returns 400 and pr_review.mjs records the validation error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4253 ms · ~2613 → 272 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on a notifier service that is not yet deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which files or modules need to be modified (e.g., the location of pr_review.mjs)"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR review event, when the platform notifier service is available at POST /api/notifier, then pr_review.mjs sends a POST request with JSON body {\"prNumber\": <number>, \"verdict\": \"approved\"|\"changes_requested\"} and receives a 200 OK response","Given the notifier service returns a non‑200 response, then pr_review.mjs logs an error and does not attempt to send a Slack message","Given the notifier service is unavailable (network timeout), then pr_review.mjs retries up to three times before failing gracefully","Given a successful notifier call, then a Slack message is posted to #dev-loop containing the PR number and verdict","Given an invalid payload (missing prNumber or verdict), then the notifier service returns 400 and pr_review.mjs records the validation error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The notifier service endpoint does not exist and no stub or mock is provided",
    "B2: \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is not testable without the real Slack integration"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or modules are referenced in the issue description"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR review, when the reviewer submits a verdict, then `pr_review.mjs` must invoke the notifier module with an object containing the numeric `prNumber` and a non‑empty string `verdict`",
    "Given a PR review, when the notifier module is invoked, then the call must be made to the configured endpoint URL (mocked in tests) and must handle HTTP errors by logging them without throwing",
    "Given a PR review, when the notifier call succeeds, then a mock Slack client must receive a message payload containing the `prNumber` and `verdict` and the test must assert the message would be posted to the #dev-loop channel",
    "Given a PR review with missing `prNumber` or `verdict`, then `pr_review.mjs` must not call the notifier and must return an error status"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21922 ms · ~2613 → 270 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The notifier service endpoint does not exist and no stub or mock is provided","B2: \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is not testable without the real Slack integration"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or modules are referenced in the issue description"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR review, when the reviewer submits a verdict, then `pr_review.mjs` must invoke the notifier module with an object containing the numeric `prNumber` and a non‑empty string `verdict`","Given a PR review, when the notifier module is invoked, then the call must be made to the configured endpoint URL (mocked in tests) and must handle HTTP errors by logging them without throwing","Given a PR review, when the notifier call succeeds, then a mock Slack client must receive a message payload containing the `prNumber` and `verdict` and the test must assert the message would be posted to the #dev-loop channel","Given a PR review with missing `prNumber` or `verdict`, then `pr_review.mjs` must not call the notifier and must return an error status"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The notifier service endpoint does not exist and no stub or mock is provided",
    "B2: \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is not testable without the real Slack integration"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR review, when the notifier service is reachable, then `pr_review.mjs` calls the notifier with a payload containing the PR number and verdict",
    "Given a PR review, when the notifier service returns a success response, then a Slack message with the verdict is posted to #dev-loop (mocked in tests)",
    "Given a PR review, when the notifier service returns an error, then the function logs the failure and does not crash",
    "Given a PR review, when the payload is missing required fields, then the notifier is not called and an error is recorded",
    "Given the notifier service is unavailable, then the system retries up to three times before giving up"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22756 ms · ~2613 → 226 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The notifier service endpoint does not exist and no stub or mock is provided","B2: \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is not testable without the real Slack integration"],"warnings":[],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR review, when the notifier service is reachable, then `pr_review.mjs` calls the notifier with a payload containing the PR number and verdict","Given a PR review, when the notifier service returns a success response, then a Slack message with the verdict is posted to #dev-loop (mocked in tests)","Given a PR review, when the notifier service returns an error, then the function logs the failure and does not crash","Given a PR review, when the payload is missing required fields, then the notifier is not called and an error is recorded","Given the notifier service is unavailable, then the system retries up to three times before giving up"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 45,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add log statements to the `process_request` function that output INFO level messages with the request ID and timestamp when a request starts",
    "Add ERROR level logging in the `handle_error` function that includes the exception type, message, and stack trace for any uncaught exceptions",
    "Ensure that all log entries include a `module` field indicating the source module name and that the logging format matches the project's standard `%(asctime)s %(levelname)s %(module)s %(message)s`"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3032 ms · ~2537 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":45,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add log statements to the `process_request` function that output INFO level messages with the request ID and timestamp when a request starts","Add ERROR level logging in the `handle_error` function that includes the exception type, message, and stack trace for any uncaught exceptions","Ensure that all log entries include a `module` field indicating the source module name and that the logging format matches the project's standard `%(asctime)s %(levelname)s %(module)s %(message)s`"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 45,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the username and timestamp",
    "Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query fails, including the query string and error message",
    "Add a log entry at DEBUG level for each request to the /api/orders endpoint, recording request method, path, and response status code"
  ]
}

call 1 · 732 ms · ~2537 → 151 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":45,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the username and timestamp","Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query fails, including the query string and error message","Add a log entry at DEBUG level for each request to the /api/orders endpoint, recording request method, path, and response status code"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files, modules, or components are named"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the username and timestamp",
    "Add a log entry at ERROR level when a database connection fails, including the error message and stack trace",
    "Ensure that all log entries include a correlation ID that is propagated through request handling",
    "Update the logging configuration to rotate log files daily and retain logs for 30 days",
    "Add unit tests that verify the logger is called with the correct level and message for both successful and failed operations"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19559 ms · ~2537 → 185 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files, modules, or components are named"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the username and timestamp","Add a log entry at ERROR level when a database connection fails, including the error message and stack trace","Ensure that all log entries include a correlation ID that is propagated through request handling","Update the logging configuration to rotate log files daily and retain logs for 30 days","Add unit tests that verify the logger is called with the correct level and message for both successful and failed operations"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message",
    "When the attempt counter reaches the maximum, no new commits are pushed to the PR",
    "If the attempt counter exceeds the maximum, the workflow exits with a non-zero status code",
    "The workflow must handle a missing or corrupted `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs` file by failing gracefully with an error message"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3965 ms · ~2577 → 163 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits","W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message","When the attempt counter reaches the maximum, no new commits are pushed to the PR","If the attempt counter exceeds the maximum, the workflow exits with a non-zero status code","The workflow must handle a missing or corrupted `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs` file by failing gracefully with an error message"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 45,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or detailed description of expected behavior beyond a vague mention of an attempt counter",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no description of correct behavior, error handling, or limits for the attempt counter"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts per PR, and no further commits are pushed after the limit is reached",
    "When the attempt counter reaches the maximum, the workflow logs a message \"Auto-fix attempt limit reached\" and exits with status SUCCESS",
    "If the attempt counter exceeds the limit, the workflow must not create any new commits and must mark the run as completed without error",
    "The workflow must handle a missing or corrupted `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs` file by logging an error and aborting without pushing commits"
  ]
}

call 1 · 18734 ms · ~2577 → 232 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or detailed description of expected behavior beyond a vague mention of an attempt counter","W2: Edge cases not covered – no description of correct behavior, error handling, or limits for the attempt counter"],"score":45,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts per PR, and no further commits are pushed after the limit is reached","When the attempt counter reaches the maximum, the workflow logs a message \"Auto-fix attempt limit reached\" and exits with status SUCCESS","If the attempt counter exceeds the limit, the workflow must not create any new commits and must mark the run as completed without error","The workflow must handle a missing or corrupted `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs` file by logging an error and aborting without pushing commits"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 45,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files beyond a vague reference and lacks context of expected behavior",
    "W2: No error or edge case scenarios described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR, and then log an error message indicating the attempt limit was reached",
    "When the attempt counter exceeds the limit, no further commits should be pushed to the PR",
    "The workflow must record the final attempt count in the CI logs and expose it as a step output",
    "If the auto-fix script encounters an unexpected error, it should abort and mark the GitHub Action as failed with a clear error message"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20520 ms · ~2577 → 188 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files beyond a vague reference and lacks context of expected behavior","W2: No error or edge case scenarios described"],"score":45,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR, and then log an error message indicating the attempt limit was reached","When the attempt counter exceeds the limit, no further commits should be pushed to the PR","The workflow must record the final attempt count in the CI logs and expose it as a step output","If the auto-fix script encounters an unexpected error, it should abort and mark the GitHub Action as failed with a clear error message"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which existing error style definitions to follow or reference the module containing them"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "A label with an empty string for `name` throws an Error with message \"Label name cannot be empty\" and includes the line number",
    "A label with a `color` value containing non-hex characters throws an Error with message indicating invalid color format and includes the label name",
    "When `labels.yaml` is empty or contains no label entries, loadLabels() returns an empty array without throwing",
    "If `labels.yaml` contains invalid YAML syntax, loadLabels() throws a SyntaxError with a message indicating the parse failure location",
    "When a label includes additional unexpected fields, loadLabels() ignores them and does not affect validation"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3192 ms · ~2648 → 207 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which existing error style definitions to follow or reference the module containing them"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["A label with an empty string for `name` throws an Error with message \"Label name cannot be empty\" and includes the line number","A label with a `color` value containing non-hex characters throws an Error with message indicating invalid color format and includes the label name","When `labels.yaml` is empty or contains no label entries, loadLabels() returns an empty array without throwing","If `labels.yaml` contains invalid YAML syntax, loadLabels() throws a SyntaxError with a message indicating the parse failure location","When a label includes additional unexpected fields, loadLabels() ignores them and does not affect validation"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid labels.yaml file, loadLabels() returns an array of label objects without throwing an error",
    "Given a labels.yaml file containing a label with an empty string for `name`, loadLabels() throws an Error that includes the line number of the offending entry",
    "Given a labels.yaml file where a label's `color` field contains characters outside the hexadecimal range or is not exactly 6 characters long, loadLabels() throws an Error that includes the label's name",
    "Given a labels.yaml file containing two labels with identical `name` values, loadLabels() throws an Error that lists both line numbers where the duplicate names occur",
    "Given a labels.yaml file that is empty or contains only comments, loadLabels() throws an Error indicating that no labels are defined"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3550 ms · ~2648 → 212 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid labels.yaml file, loadLabels() returns an array of label objects without throwing an error","Given a labels.yaml file containing a label with an empty string for `name`, loadLabels() throws an Error that includes the line number of the offending entry","Given a labels.yaml file where a label's `color` field contains characters outside the hexadecimal range or is not exactly 6 characters long, loadLabels() throws an Error that includes the label's name","Given a labels.yaml file containing two labels with identical `name` values, loadLabels() throws an Error that lists both line numbers where the duplicate names occur","Given a labels.yaml file that is empty or contains only comments, loadLabels() throws an Error indicating that no labels are defined"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid `labels.yaml` file, `loadLabels()` returns an array of label objects with `name` and `color` fields without throwing an error",
    "Given a `labels.yaml` where a label entry is missing the `name` field, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that includes the line number of the offending entry",
    "Given a `labels.yaml` where a label's `color` field is not a 6‑character hexadecimal string, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that includes the label's name",
    "Given a `labels.yaml` containing two labels with the same `name`, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that lists both line numbers where the duplicate names occur",
    "Given a malformed YAML file, `loadLabels()` throws a parsing `Error` consistent with the project's error‑handling style"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3810 ms · ~2648 → 204 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid `labels.yaml` file, `loadLabels()` returns an array of label objects with `name` and `color` fields without throwing an error","Given a `labels.yaml` where a label entry is missing the `name` field, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that includes the line number of the offending entry","Given a `labels.yaml` where a label's `color` field is not a 6‑character hexadecimal string, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that includes the label's name","Given a `labels.yaml` containing two labels with the same `name`, `loadLabels()` throws an `Error` that lists both line numbers where the duplicate names occur","Given a malformed YAML file, `loadLabels()` throws a parsing `Error` consistent with the project's error‑handling style"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non-testable and lacks measurable performance metric"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify where or how the cache should be stored (e.g., in-memory variable, module scope)"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string",
    "Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not called and the returned string is identical to the first call",
    "When loadPrompt is called with a non‑existent file name, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a directory containing at least 1000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes within 200 ms"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4678 ms · ~2635 → 229 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non-testable and lacks measurable performance metric"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify where or how the cache should be stored (e.g., in-memory variable, module scope)"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string","Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not called and the returned string is identical to the first call","When loadPrompt is called with a non‑existent file name, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a directory containing at least 1000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes within 200 ms"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non-testable and lacks measurable performance metric"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns its contents as a string",
    "Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not called and the returned string is identical to the first call",
    "Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a very large prompt file (e.g., >5 MB), when loadPrompt is called, then the call completes within 200 ms",
    "Given concurrent calls to loadPrompt with the same name, when all calls resolve, then each returns the same cached string and fs.readFileSync is invoked only once"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4441 ms · ~2635 → 233 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non-testable and lacks measurable performance metric"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns its contents as a string","Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not called and the returned string is identical to the first call","Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a very large prompt file (e.g., >5 MB), when loadPrompt is called, then the call completes within 200 ms","Given concurrent calls to loadPrompt with the same name, when all calls resolve, then each returns the same cached string and fs.readFileSync is invoked only once"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable criteria"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as empty or missing prompt directories are not explicitly covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string",
    "Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call",
    "Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a prompt directory containing at least 1000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for any file, then the call completes in under 200 ms",
    "Given an empty prompt directory, when loadPrompt is called for a missing file, then it throws \"Prompt file not found\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 4376 ms · ~2635 → 249 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable criteria"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as empty or missing prompt directories are not explicitly covered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string","Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call","Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a prompt directory containing at least 1000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for any file, then the call completes in under 200 ms","Given an empty prompt directory, when loadPrompt is called for a missing file, then it throws \"Prompt file not found\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as queries with no matches or ties in relevance are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "searchReports('') throws TypeError for empty string input",
    "searchReports('nonexistent') returns an empty array",
    "When more than 10 reports match the query, the function returns exactly 10 objects sorted by descending score",
    "Each returned object contains only the fields issueNumber (integer) and score (number)",
    "searchReports does not modify any files in observability/reports/"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4825 ms · ~2637 → 165 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as queries with no matches or ties in relevance are not addressed"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["searchReports('') throws TypeError for empty string input","searchReports('nonexistent') returns an empty array","When more than 10 reports match the query, the function returns exactly 10 objects sorted by descending score","Each returned object contains only the fields issueNumber (integer) and score (number)","searchReports does not modify any files in observability/reports/"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not defined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are searched",
    "W2: No edge cases for non‑string queries, extremely long queries, or queries that match fewer than 10 reports"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given an empty string query, calling searchReports('') throws a TypeError",
    "Given a non‑empty string query, searchReports returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields",
    "Given a query that matches more than 10 reports, searchReports returns exactly the 10 reports with the highest score values, where score is defined as the number of matching keywords in the report title and description",
    "Given a query that matches fewer than 10 reports, searchReports returns all matching reports sorted by descending score",
    "Given a non‑string query (e.g., null, number, object), searchReports throws a TypeError"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5490 ms · ~2637 → 259 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not defined"],"warnings":["W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are searched","W2: No edge cases for non‑string queries, extremely long queries, or queries that match fewer than 10 reports"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given an empty string query, calling searchReports('') throws a TypeError","Given a non‑empty string query, searchReports returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields","Given a query that matches more than 10 reports, searchReports returns exactly the 10 reports with the highest score values, where score is defined as the number of matching keywords in the report title and description","Given a query that matches fewer than 10 reports, searchReports returns all matching reports sorted by descending score","Given a non‑string query (e.g., null, number, object), searchReports throws a TypeError"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is undefined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are considered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "searchReports('') throws TypeError for empty string input",
    "searchReports('valid query') returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields",
    "searchReports('valid query') returns results sorted by descending relevance score as defined by the function's relevance algorithm",
    "searchReports('valid query') returns fewer than 10 results when fewer matching reports exist",
    "searchReports(nonStringInput) throws TypeError"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4882 ms · ~2637 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is undefined"],"warnings":["W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are considered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["searchReports('') throws TypeError for empty string input","searchReports('valid query') returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields","searchReports('valid query') returns results sorted by descending relevance score as defined by the function's relevance algorithm","searchReports('valid query') returns fewer than 10 results when fewer matching reports exist","searchReports(nonStringInput) throws TypeError"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context about how the cost is computed or which currency conversion rates are used",
    "W2: Edge cases such as negative or fractional token counts are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- La section affiche le coût en dollars calculé pour chaque modèle listé dans le tableau `SUPPORTED_MODELS = [\"gpt-3.5-turbo\",\"gpt-4\",\"gpt-4o\"]` et le total global",
    "- Si `tokens_est` est négatif ou non entier, la section indique \"Valeur de tokens invalide\" et ne calcule pas de coût",
    "- La section inclut un tableau avec deux colonnes: \"Cas\" et \"Coût ($)\" où chaque ligne correspond à un cas d'évaluation et montre le coût calculé",
    "- Un test unit ajoute un mock de taux de change USD et vérifie que le coût affiché correspond au calcul `tokens_est * price_per_token` pour chaque modèle supporté",
    "- Un test vérifie que la section est complètement omise lorsque `tokens_est` vaut 0 ou que tous les modèles ont un coût de 0"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6540 ms · ~2634 → 283 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context about how the cost is computed or which currency conversion rates are used","W2: Edge cases such as negative or fractional token counts are not addressed"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- La section affiche le coût en dollars calculé pour chaque modèle listé dans le tableau `SUPPORTED_MODELS = [\"gpt-3.5-turbo\",\"gpt-4\",\"gpt-4o\"]` et le total global","- Si `tokens_est` est négatif ou non entier, la section indique \"Valeur de tokens invalide\" et ne calcule pas de coût","- La section inclut un tableau avec deux colonnes: \"Cas\" et \"Coût ($)\" où chaque ligne correspond à un cas d'évaluation et montre le coût calculé","- Un test unit ajoute un mock de taux de change USD et vérifie que le coût affiché correspond au calcul `tokens_est * price_per_token` pour chaque modèle supporté","- Un test vérifie que la section est complètement omise lorsque `tokens_est` vaut 0 ou que tous les modèles ont un coût de 0"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No explicit mention of which parts of the codebase besides the script need to be updated (e.g., documentation, CI config)",
    "W2: Edge cases such as negative or missing token counts are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- La section `## Coût` affiche le total de `tokens_est` et le détail par cas dans le tableau Markdown",
    "- La section `## Coût` n’est pas générée lorsque `tokens_est` vaut 0 pour tous les cas",
    "- Le coût en dollars est calculé en utilisant le tarif par token défini dans `src/constants/model_pricing.js` pour chaque modèle listé dans `src/constants/common_models.js`",
    "- Un test unit dans `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` vérifie que le calcul du coût échoue proprement si un modèle inconnu est rencontré",
    "- Un test unit dans `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` vérifie que des valeurs négatives ou nulles de `tokens_est` sont traitées comme 0 et n’incluent pas de ligne de coût"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4557 ms · ~2634 → 276 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"],"warnings":["W1: No explicit mention of which parts of the codebase besides the script need to be updated (e.g., documentation, CI config)","W2: Edge cases such as negative or missing token counts are not addressed"],"score":70,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- La section `## Coût` affiche le total de `tokens_est` et le détail par cas dans le tableau Markdown","- La section `## Coût` n’est pas générée lorsque `tokens_est` vaut 0 pour tous les cas","- Le coût en dollars est calculé en utilisant le tarif par token défini dans `src/constants/model_pricing.js` pour chaque modèle listé dans `src/constants/common_models.js`","- Un test unit dans `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` vérifie que le calcul du coût échoue proprement si un modèle inconnu est rencontré","- Un test unit dans `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` vérifie que des valeurs négatives ou nulles de `tokens_est` sont traitées comme 0 et n’incluent pas de ligne de coût"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which models are considered \"common\" for cost calculation",
    "W1: Issue does not describe the source or format of the `tokens_est` data"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The Markdown report includes a line `Total tokens: <number>` showing the sum of `tokens_est` across all test cases",
    "The Markdown report includes a table with columns `Case` and `Tokens` listing `tokens_est` for each individual case",
    "When `tokens_est` is 0 for all cases, the `## Coût` section is omitted from the generated report",
    "The cost in USD is calculated using the per‑token price for each model listed in the project's `models.json` file and displayed as `Cost (USD): <value>`",
    "A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the `## Coût` section is present with correct token totals and cost values for at least one common model (e.g., `gpt-3.5-turbo`) and absent when totals are zero"
  ]
}

call 1 · 24011 ms · ~2634 → 279 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because the set of \"modèles courants\" is not defined"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which models are considered \"common\" for cost calculation","W1: Issue does not describe the source or format of the `tokens_est` data"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The Markdown report includes a line `Total tokens: <number>` showing the sum of `tokens_est` across all test cases","The Markdown report includes a table with columns `Case` and `Tokens` listing `tokens_est` for each individual case","When `tokens_est` is 0 for all cases, the `## Coût` section is omitted from the generated report","The cost in USD is calculated using the per‑token price for each model listed in the project's `models.json` file and displayed as `Cost (USD): <value>`","A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the `## Coût` section is present with correct token totals and cost values for at least one common model (e.g., `gpt-3.5-turbo`) and absent when totals are zero"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 65,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – the criteria refer to “users who are not allowed to manage members” without defining who is allowed or the permission rules."
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no reference to existing authorization middleware or role definitions.",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no tests for invalid role values, empty member list, or pagination."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an array of objects containing `userId` and `role` for a project that exists, and returns 404 if the project does not exist",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with the updated member object when called by a user with the `project_admin` role",
    "PATCH returns 400 when the supplied `role` value is not one of the allowed enum values (`owner`, `maintainer`, `viewer`)",
    "PATCH and DELETE return 403 when the authenticated user lacks the `manage_members` permission for the project",
    "DELETE returns 404 when attempting to remove a member that is not part of the project"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6546 ms · ~2671 → 264 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – the criteria refer to “users who are not allowed to manage members” without defining who is allowed or the permission rules."],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no reference to existing authorization middleware or role definitions.","W2: Edge cases not covered – no tests for invalid role values, empty member list, or pagination."],"score":65,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an array of objects containing `userId` and `role` for a project that exists, and returns 404 if the project does not exist","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with the updated member object when called by a user with the `project_admin` role","PATCH returns 400 when the supplied `role` value is not one of the allowed enum values (`owner`, `maintainer`, `viewer`)","PATCH and DELETE return 403 when the authenticated user lacks the `manage_members` permission for the project","DELETE returns 404 when attempting to remove a member that is not part of the project"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 55,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – undefined rule for which users are allowed to manage members"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context about how authorization is determined",
    "W2: No error case specified for PATCH on unknown member"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an array of objects containing userId and role for a project that exists",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with updated role when performed by a user with the 'admin' or 'manager' role for that project",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when the specified userId is not a member of the project",
    "DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 when performed by a user without the 'admin' role for that project",
    "DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when attempting to delete a userId that is not a member of the project"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4275 ms · ~2671 → 228 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – undefined rule for which users are allowed to manage members"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context about how authorization is determined","W2: No error case specified for PATCH on unknown member"],"score":55,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an array of objects containing userId and role for a project that exists","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with updated role when performed by a user with the 'admin' or 'manager' role for that project","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when the specified userId is not a member of the project","DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 when performed by a user without the 'admin' role for that project","DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when attempting to delete a userId that is not a member of the project"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which roles or permissions are considered allowed to manage members, leaving authorization logic ambiguous",
    "W2: Issue does not cover error handling for GET on non‑existent project or PATCH on unknown member, nor does it specify behavior for invalid role values"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project with :id does not exist",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed roles",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when :userId is not a member of the project",
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an empty array when the project has no members"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6666 ms · ~2671 → 189 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which roles or permissions are considered allowed to manage members, leaving authorization logic ambiguous","W2: Issue does not cover error handling for GET on non‑existent project or PATCH on unknown member, nor does it specify behavior for invalid role values"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project with :id does not exist","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed roles","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when :userId is not a member of the project","GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an empty array when the project has no members"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role org_admin, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing the full audit log",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role project_admin, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Given an unauthenticated request, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role member, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Given a request with a malformed or missing authentication token, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20612 ms · ~2652 → 215 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"],"warnings":[],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given an authenticated request by a user with role org_admin, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing the full audit log","Given an authenticated request by a user with role project_admin, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Given an unauthenticated request, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401","Given an authenticated request by a user with role member, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Given a request with a malformed or missing authentication token, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role org_admin to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing the full audit log",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role project_admin to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with role member to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Given an unauthenticated request to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401",
    "Given an authenticated request by org_admin with an empty audit log, then the response status is 200 and the CSV body is empty (only headers)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4378 ms · ~2652 → 206 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"],"warnings":[],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given an authenticated request by a user with role org_admin to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing the full audit log","Given an authenticated request by a user with role project_admin to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Given an authenticated request by a user with role member to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Given an unauthenticated request to GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401","Given an authenticated request by org_admin with an empty audit log, then the response status is 200 and the CSV body is empty (only headers)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with the org_admin role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing audit entries for all projects",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with the project_admin role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Given an unauthenticated request, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401",
    "Given an authenticated request by a user with the member role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403",
    "Add unit tests that verify the CSV format includes headers \"timestamp,project_id,user_id,action\" and that the response Content-Type header is \"text/csv\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 21829 ms · ~2652 → 226 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" is undefined; could refer to org_admin, project_admin, or both"],"warnings":[],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given an authenticated request by a user with the org_admin role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 200 and the body is a CSV containing audit entries for all projects","Given an authenticated request by a user with the project_admin role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Given an unauthenticated request, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 401","Given an authenticated request by a user with the member role, when calling GET /api/audit/export, then the response status is 403","Add unit tests that verify the CSV format includes headers \"timestamp,project_id,user_id,action\" and that the response Content-Type header is \"text/csv\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which component or module reads LOG_LEVEL or how the configuration is applied"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL environment variable is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "The application reads LOG_LEVEL from the environment and logs at INFO level for all requests in deployed environments",
    "The test suite includes a test that verifies LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" for preview, staging, and production configurations and \"debug\" for local.yaml",
    "If an environment variable overrides the YAML setting, the effective LOG_LEVEL must still be \"info\" in deployed environments",
    "When LOG_LEVEL is set to an invalid value, the application defaults to \"info\" and logs a warning"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3972 ms · ~2618 → 197 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which component or module reads LOG_LEVEL or how the configuration is applied"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL environment variable is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","The application reads LOG_LEVEL from the environment and logs at INFO level for all requests in deployed environments","The test suite includes a test that verifies LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" for preview, staging, and production configurations and \"debug\" for local.yaml","If an environment variable overrides the YAML setting, the effective LOG_LEVEL must still be \"info\" in deployed environments","When LOG_LEVEL is set to an invalid value, the application defaults to \"info\" and logs a warning"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which component or code path sets LOG_LEVEL, missing technical context about where the change should be applied"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "The existing local.yaml file retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\" after the change",
    "Running `npm test` executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming each environment file has the expected LOG_LEVEL",
    "If any environment file is missing a LOG_LEVEL entry, the build fails with an error indicating the missing configuration",
    "A CI lint step fails when LOG_LEVEL is set to any value other than \"info\" in deployed environment files"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4171 ms · ~2618 → 187 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which component or code path sets LOG_LEVEL, missing technical context about where the change should be applied"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","The existing local.yaml file retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\" after the change","Running `npm test` executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming each environment file has the expected LOG_LEVEL","If any environment file is missing a LOG_LEVEL entry, the build fails with an error indicating the missing configuration","A CI lint step fails when LOG_LEVEL is set to any value other than \"info\" in deployed environment files"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which component or module reads LOG_LEVEL, missing technical context for implementation"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL environment variable is set to 'info' in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "LOG_LEVEL remains 'debug' in local.yaml and is not altered by any deployment script",
    "Running `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` passes, confirming each environment file has the correct LOG_LEVEL value",
    "A CI pipeline step verifies that no deployment process overwrites LOG_LEVEL to a non-'info' value in deployed environments",
    "Documentation in README is updated to reflect that debug logging is only enabled for local development"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4076 ms · ~2618 → 181 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which component or module reads LOG_LEVEL, missing technical context for implementation"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL environment variable is set to 'info' in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","LOG_LEVEL remains 'debug' in local.yaml and is not altered by any deployment script","Running `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` passes, confirming each environment file has the correct LOG_LEVEL value","A CI pipeline step verifies that no deployment process overwrites LOG_LEVEL to a non-'info' value in deployed environments","Documentation in README is updated to reflect that debug logging is only enabled for local development"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading mechanism or scripts need to be updated to enforce the LOG_LEVEL change"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "Running the test suite executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming each deployed environment file has LOG_LEVEL set to \"info\"",
    "When the application starts in any deployed environment, no log entries contain request body contents",
    "If a developer overrides LOG_LEVEL via an environment variable at runtime, the override is ignored for deployed environments and the effective level remains \"info\"",
    "The CI pipeline fails if any deployed environment configuration file contains LOG_LEVEL set to a value other than \"info\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 2014 ms · ~2621 → 211 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading mechanism or scripts need to be updated to enforce the LOG_LEVEL change"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","Running the test suite executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming each deployed environment file has LOG_LEVEL set to \"info\"","When the application starts in any deployed environment, no log entries contain request body contents","If a developer overrides LOG_LEVEL via an environment variable at runtime, the override is ignored for deployed environments and the effective level remains \"info\"","The CI pipeline fails if any deployed environment configuration file contains LOG_LEVEL set to a value other than \"info\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading code or deployment scripts need to be modified, missing technical context about affected components."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files after the change",
    "local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL: debug and this is verified by a unit test",
    "scripts/tests/config.test.mjs includes a test that fails if any deployed environment file has LOG_LEVEL other than \"info\"",
    "Adding a new environment file (e.g., test.yaml) defaults LOG_LEVEL to \"info\" unless explicitly set to debug",
    "The CI pipeline runs the config.test.mjs suite and fails the build if the LOG_LEVEL check does not pass"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6172 ms · ~2621 → 190 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading code or deployment scripts need to be modified, missing technical context about affected components."],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files after the change","local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL: debug and this is verified by a unit test","scripts/tests/config.test.mjs includes a test that fails if any deployed environment file has LOG_LEVEL other than \"info\"","Adding a new environment file (e.g., test.yaml) defaults LOG_LEVEL to \"info\" unless explicitly set to debug","The CI pipeline runs the config.test.mjs suite and fails the build if the LOG_LEVEL check does not pass"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services need to be modified to enforce the LOG_LEVEL change"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\"",
    "Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which asserts that each deployed environment config file has LOG_LEVEL equal to \"info\" and that local.yaml has LOG_LEVEL equal to \"debug\"",
    "A CI pipeline step fails if any deployed environment config file does not have LOG_LEVEL set to \"info\"",
    "Documentation in README is updated to note that debug logging is only enabled in local development environments"
  ]
}

call 1 · 999 ms · ~2621 → 189 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services need to be modified to enforce the LOG_LEVEL change"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\"","Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which asserts that each deployed environment config file has LOG_LEVEL equal to \"info\" and that local.yaml has LOG_LEVEL equal to \"debug\"","A CI pipeline step fails if any deployed environment config file does not have LOG_LEVEL set to \"info\"","Documentation in README is updated to note that debug logging is only enabled in local development environments"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as pricing service failure or missing token counts are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script fetches model prices from the pricing service mock endpoint when the real service is unavailable, and uses the mocked prices for cost calculation",
    "If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and adds `Cost: unavailable` to the comment",
    "The comment includes the cost line formatted as `Cost: $<value>` with the value rounded to exactly 4 decimal places",
    "The pricing service is queried exactly once per script execution, verified by a mock call count in tests"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4458 ms · ~2660 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as pricing service failure or missing token counts are not addressed"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script fetches model prices from the pricing service mock endpoint when the real service is unavailable, and uses the mocked prices for cost calculation","If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and adds `Cost: unavailable` to the comment","The comment includes the cost line formatted as `Cost: $<value>` with the value rounded to exactly 4 decimal places","The pricing service is queried exactly once per script execution, verified by a mock call count in tests"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Pricing service dependency not available and no stub or mock provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No details about the pricing service endpoint or authentication"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero",
    "If the pricing service request fails, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and logs an error",
    "Prices are cached and reused for multiple PR reviews within the same process execution",
    "The script logs a warning if the fetched price data does not contain the model used in the review",
    "The test suite includes a case where the pricing service returns malformed JSON and verifies graceful handling"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4699 ms · ~2660 → 176 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Pricing service dependency not available and no stub or mock provided"],"warnings":["W1: No details about the pricing service endpoint or authentication"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero","If the pricing service request fails, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and logs an error","Prices are cached and reused for multiple PR reviews within the same process execution","The script logs a warning if the fetched price data does not contain the model used in the review","The test suite includes a case where the pricing service returns malformed JSON and verifies graceful handling"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero",
    "If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and omits the cost line from the comment",
    "The script fetches pricing data only once per execution, even if multiple reviews are processed in the same run",
    "When a model name is not present in the pricing response, the script uses a default price of $0.0000 per million tokens",
    "The test suite includes a case where the pricing service returns different prices for input and output tokens and verifies the calculated cost matches the expected value"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5483 ms · ~2660 → 194 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero","If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and omits the cost line from the comment","The script fetches pricing data only once per execution, even if multiple reviews are processed in the same run","When a model name is not present in the pricing response, the script uses a default price of $0.0000 per million tokens","The test suite includes a case where the pricing service returns different prices for input and output tokens and verifies the calculated cost matches the expected value"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: No edge case handling for pricing service failures or missing token data"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes `Cost: $<usd>` with correct calculation for any integer input and output token counts, rounded to 4 decimals",
    "If the pricing service request fails or returns an error, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and logs an appropriate warning",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple PR reviews are processed in the same run",
    "When the pricing service returns missing fields, the script treats missing prices as 0 and still calculates the cost",
    "A test verifies that when the pricing service returns a 500 error, the comment falls back to `Cost: unavailable`"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4671 ms · ~2697 → 216 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: No edge case handling for pricing service failures or missing token data"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes `Cost: $<usd>` with correct calculation for any integer input and output token counts, rounded to 4 decimals","If the pricing service request fails or returns an error, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and logs an appropriate warning","Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple PR reviews are processed in the same run","When the pricing service returns missing fields, the script treats missing prices as 0 and still calculates the cost","A test verifies that when the pricing service returns a 500 error, the comment falls back to `Cost: unavailable`"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: No edge case handling specified for pricing service failures or missing token data"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script must handle pricing service errors gracefully by logging a warning and omitting the cost line in the comment",
    "If the pricing service returns a non‑200 response, the script should fallback to a default cost of $0.00 and include a note in the comment",
    "The cost calculation must correctly round to 4 decimal places for any token counts, including zero and very large numbers",
    "When the pricing service is unavailable, the script must not retry more than once per run",
    "The test suite must include a case where the pricing service returns malformed JSON and verify that the script does not crash"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21146 ms · ~2697 → 217 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: No edge case handling specified for pricing service failures or missing token data"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script must handle pricing service errors gracefully by logging a warning and omitting the cost line in the comment","If the pricing service returns a non‑200 response, the script should fallback to a default cost of $0.00 and include a note in the comment","The cost calculation must correctly round to 4 decimal places for any token counts, including zero and very large numbers","When the pricing service is unavailable, the script must not retry more than once per run","The test suite must include a case where the pricing service returns malformed JSON and verify that the script does not crash"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places",
    "If the pricing service returns an error or is unreachable, the script logs a warning and appends `Cost: unavailable` to the comment",
    "When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution from that side",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple PR reviews are processed in the same run",
    "A test verifies that for 0 input tokens and 0 output tokens the comment ends with `Cost: $0.0000`"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22842 ms · ~2697 → 225 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places","If the pricing service returns an error or is unreachable, the script logs a warning and appends `Cost: unavailable` to the comment","When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution from that side","Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple PR reviews are processed in the same run","A test verifies that for 0 input tokens and 0 output tokens the comment ends with `Cost: $0.0000`"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which files or modules besides the mentioned scripts are affected, nor the broader context of the PR review system."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes a cost line for zero input and zero output tokens, resulting in `Cost: $0.0000`.",
    "The comment correctly rounds the cost to 4 decimal places for large token counts (e.g., 12,345,678 input tokens and 9,876,543 output tokens).",
    "If `getPrice(model)` throws an error, the script logs the error and falls back to the stub prices, and the comment still includes a cost line using the fallback values.",
    "The pricing service is called exactly once per script execution, verified by a mock that tracks the number of calls to `getPrice`.",
    "The comment format remains unchanged except for the appended cost line, even when other comment content varies."
  ]
}

call 1 · 5890 ms · ~2704 → 220 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which files or modules besides the mentioned scripts are affected, nor the broader context of the PR review system."],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes a cost line for zero input and zero output tokens, resulting in `Cost: $0.0000`.","The comment correctly rounds the cost to 4 decimal places for large token counts (e.g., 12,345,678 input tokens and 9,876,543 output tokens).","If `getPrice(model)` throws an error, the script logs the error and falls back to the stub prices, and the comment still includes a cost line using the fallback values.","The pricing service is called exactly once per script execution, verified by a mock that tracks the number of calls to `getPrice`.","The comment format remains unchanged except for the appended cost line, even when other comment content varies."]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and large token counts are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1_000_000)*inputPrice + (outputTokens/1_000_000)*outputPrice, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `scripts/pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called only a single time even when multiple comments are generated in the same run",
    "When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects a $0 contribution for that side and the total cost is still rounded to 4 decimals",
    "The cost line is correctly formatted and appears as the last line of the PR review comment for token counts up to 10 million tokens",
    "If the pricing stub throws an error, `scripts/pr_review.mjs` logs the error and falls back to a default price of {inputPerMTok:0.15,outputPerMTok:0.6} and still produces a correctly formatted cost line"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4906 ms · ~2704 → 269 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and large token counts are not covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1_000_000)*inputPrice + (outputTokens/1_000_000)*outputPrice, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts","Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `scripts/pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called only a single time even when multiple comments are generated in the same run","When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects a $0 contribution for that side and the total cost is still rounded to 4 decimals","The cost line is correctly formatted and appears as the last line of the PR review comment for token counts up to 10 million tokens","If the pricing stub throws an error, `scripts/pr_review.mjs` logs the error and falls back to a default price of {inputPerMTok:0.15,outputPerMTok:0.6} and still produces a correctly formatted cost line"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, extremely large token counts, and handling of pricing service failures are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens × inputPrice + outputTokens × outputPrice) using prices per million tokens, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called a single time even when multiple comments could be generated",
    "When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution for that side and the total cost is still displayed with four decimal places",
    "If `getPrice` throws an error or returns invalid data, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and the script exits with a non‑zero status",
    "A test verifies that for 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens the comment contains the exact line `Cost: $0.2250` (using the stub prices)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6103 ms · ~2704 → 258 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, extremely large token counts, and handling of pricing service failures are not covered"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens × inputPrice + outputTokens × outputPrice) using prices per million tokens, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places","Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called a single time even when multiple comments could be generated","When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution for that side and the total cost is still displayed with four decimal places","If `getPrice` throws an error or returns invalid data, the comment includes `Cost: unavailable` and the script exits with a non‑zero status","A test verifies that for 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens the comment contains the exact line `Cost: $0.2250` (using the stub prices)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and non-testable (\"Corriger le bug\", \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\")"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected files or modules",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 200 and a non‑empty CSV file containing all expected columns when given a typical dataset",
    "Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 400 with a clear error message when the request payload is missing required parameters",
    "Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 500 with a clear error message when an internal database error occurs during export",
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a CSV file containing only the header row when the dataset is empty",
    "Export CSV operation completes in under 2 seconds for datasets up to 10 000 rows"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3732 ms · ~2565 → 218 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and non-testable (\"Corriger le bug\", \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\")"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected files or modules","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 200 and a non‑empty CSV file containing all expected columns when given a typical dataset","Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 400 with a clear error message when the request payload is missing required parameters","Export CSV endpoint returns HTTP 500 with a clear error message when an internal database error occurs during export","Export CSV endpoint returns a CSV file containing only the header row when the dataset is empty","Export CSV operation completes in under 2 seconds for datasets up to 10 000 rows"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and a .csv extension for a valid request",
    "The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names of the source data",
    "When the source data set is empty, the export returns a CSV file containing only the header row and a 200 status code",
    "If the export process exceeds 2 seconds for a dataset of 10,000 rows, the request returns a 504 timeout error",
    "When the source data contains invalid characters, the export sanitises them and the resulting CSV is valid UTF‑8"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3626 ms · ~2565 → 217 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague","B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and a .csv extension for a valid request","The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names of the source data","When the source data set is empty, the export returns a CSV file containing only the header row and a 200 status code","If the export process exceeds 2 seconds for a dataset of 10,000 rows, the request returns a 504 timeout error","When the source data contains invalid characters, the export sanitises them and the resulting CSV is valid UTF‑8"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and a .csv extension for a valid request",
    "The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names defined in the data model",
    "When the dataset is empty, the export returns a CSV file with only the header row and HTTP 200 status",
    "If the request payload exceeds 10,000 rows, the export completes within 2 seconds and returns a valid CSV file",
    "When the export process encounters a database error, the API returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error message describing the failure"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3103 ms · ~2565 → 218 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague","B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and a .csv extension for a valid request","The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names defined in the data model","When the dataset is empty, the export returns a CSV file with only the header row and HTTP 200 status","If the request payload exceeds 10,000 rows, the export completes within 2 seconds and returns a valid CSV file","When the export process encounters a database error, the API returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error message describing the failure"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 50,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that config/models.yaml is syntactically valid YAML and can be parsed without errors",
    "- Ensure that all model entries in config/models.yaml include required fields: name (string), version (string), and path (string)",
    "- Confirm that any deprecated model entries are removed and that a comment is added documenting the cleanup",
    "- Add a unit test that loads config/models.yaml and asserts the total number of model entries matches the expected count after cleanup"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3278 ms · ~2540 → 172 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"],"score":50,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that config/models.yaml is syntactically valid YAML and can be parsed without errors","- Ensure that all model entries in config/models.yaml include required fields: name (string), version (string), and path (string)","- Confirm that any deprecated model entries are removed and that a comment is added documenting the cleanup","- Add a unit test that loads config/models.yaml and asserts the total number of model entries matches the expected count after cleanup"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 50,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The updated config/models.yaml must be valid YAML and parse without errors using the project's configuration loader",
    "All model entries in config/models.yaml must include the required fields: name, version, and path, and any missing fields cause a validation error",
    "Running the project's configuration validation script must report zero errors after the cleanup",
    "The git diff of config/models.yaml after the change must not remove any existing model entries unless they are marked as deprecated in the issue description"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1763 ms · ~2540 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"],"score":50,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The updated config/models.yaml must be valid YAML and parse without errors using the project's configuration loader","All model entries in config/models.yaml must include the required fields: name, version, and path, and any missing fields cause a validation error","Running the project's configuration validation script must report zero errors after the cleanup","The git diff of config/models.yaml after the change must not remove any existing model entries unless they are marked as deprecated in the issue description"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 50,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that config/models.yaml is syntactically valid YAML and can be parsed without errors",
    "- Ensure that all model entries in config/models.yaml include required fields: name (string), version (string), and path (string)",
    "- Confirm that any deprecated model entries are removed and that a comment is added documenting the cleanup"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2180 ms · ~2540 → 137 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"],"score":50,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that config/models.yaml is syntactically valid YAML and can be parsed without errors","- Ensure that all model entries in config/models.yaml include required fields: name (string), version (string), and path (string)","- Confirm that any deprecated model entries are removed and that a comment is added documenting the cleanup"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(1500) returns '1.5s'",
    "formatDuration(60000) returns '1m'",
    "formatDuration(-5) throws RangeError",
    "formatDuration(null) throws TypeError",
    "formatDuration(undefined) returns '0s'"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2812 ms · ~2569 → 67 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(1500) returns '1.5s'","formatDuration(60000) returns '1m'","formatDuration(-5) throws RangeError","formatDuration(null) throws TypeError","formatDuration(undefined) returns '0s'"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules beyond a vague path",
    "W2: Only the zero-duration case is covered; other typical cases like positive durations, negative inputs, and large values are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(1500) returns '1.5s'",
    "formatDuration(3600) returns '1h'",
    "formatDuration(-5) throws a RangeError",
    "formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError",
    "formatDuration(123456789) returns a string representing the duration without overflow"
  ]
}

call 1 · 18936 ms · ~2569 → 133 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules beyond a vague path","W2: Only the zero-duration case is covered; other typical cases like positive durations, negative inputs, and large values are not addressed"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(1500) returns '1.5s'","formatDuration(3600) returns '1h'","formatDuration(-5) throws a RangeError","formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError","formatDuration(123456789) returns a string representing the duration without overflow"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(12345) returns '12.34s' (rounded to two decimal places)",
    "formatDuration(-5) throws a RangeError for negative input",
    "formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError for non-number input",
    "formatDuration(60000) returns '1m 0s' (handles minutes correctly)",
    "formatDuration(0) returns '0s' and the regression test asserts this behavior"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3921 ms · ~2569 → 104 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(12345) returns '12.34s' (rounded to two decimal places)","formatDuration(-5) throws a RangeError for negative input","formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError for non-number input","formatDuration(60000) returns '1m 0s' (handles minutes correctly)","formatDuration(0) returns '0s' and the regression test asserts this behavior"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('123') returns '123'",
    "slugify('  multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'",
    "slugify('Café-au-lait!') returns 'cafe-au-lait'",
    "slugify('---Already--slug---') returns 'already-slug'",
    "slugify('中文') returns '' (no alphanumeric characters)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2851 ms · ~2633 → 82 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('123') returns '123'","slugify('  multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'","slugify('Café-au-lait!') returns 'cafe-au-lait'","slugify('---Already--slug---') returns 'already-slug'","slugify('中文') returns '' (no alphanumeric characters)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('123') returns '123'",
    "slugify('  multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'",
    "slugify('Café-au-lait!') returns 'cafe-au-lait'",
    "slugify('---Already--slug---') returns 'already-slug'",
    "slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou'"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19585 ms · ~2633 → 75 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('123') returns '123'","slugify('  multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'","slugify('Café-au-lait!') returns 'cafe-au-lait'","slugify('---Already--slug---') returns 'already-slug'","slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou'"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify(null) throws a TypeError",
    "slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive non‑alphanumerics collapsed to a single hyphen)",
    "slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)",
    "slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles additional accented characters)",
    "slugify('   leading and trailing   ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace and hyphens)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2977 ms · ~2633 → 112 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify(null) throws a TypeError","slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive non‑alphanumerics collapsed to a single hyphen)","slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)","slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles additional accented characters)","slugify('   leading and trailing   ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace and hyphens)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which code module or file should implement the endpoint, lacking technical context"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json",
    "GET /version returns Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "If the version field is missing in package.json, GET /version returns HTTP 500 with an error JSON containing a message field",
    "GET /version response time is under 100ms for a cold start",
    "GET /version is documented in the API README with example request and response"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2925 ms · ~2588 → 154 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which code module or file should implement the endpoint, lacking technical context"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json","GET /version returns Content-Type header set to application/json","If the version field is missing in package.json, GET /version returns HTTP 500 with an error JSON containing a message field","GET /version response time is under 100ms for a cold start","GET /version is documented in the API README with example request and response"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which module or file should implement the endpoint, lacking technical context"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON body containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "GET /version when package.json version field is missing returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON",
    "GET /version includes CORS headers allowing any origin"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2707 ms · ~2588 → 146 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which module or file should implement the endpoint, lacking technical context"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON body containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json","GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","GET /version when package.json version field is missing returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON","GET /version includes CORS headers allowing any origin"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which module or file should implement the endpoint, nor any existing routing framework details."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "GET /version when the version field is missing in package.json returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON",
    "GET /version includes CORS headers allowing any origin",
    "GET /version response time is under 100ms for a cold start"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3295 ms · ~2588 → 166 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which module or file should implement the endpoint, nor any existing routing framework details."],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json","GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","GET /version when the version field is missing in package.json returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON","GET /version includes CORS headers allowing any origin","GET /version response time is under 100ms for a cold start"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "When `--dry-run` is provided, the script exits with status code 0 after printing all planned actions",
    "When `--dry-run` is provided alongside other flags, the script still prints actions and does not execute any `gh` commands",
    "When an invalid label name is encountered in dry-run mode, the script prints an error message and continues processing remaining labels",
    "When `--dry-run` is used and the script encounters a network error while fetching existing labels, it logs the error but does not attempt any `gh` commands",
    "When `--dry-run` is omitted, the script's output and side effects remain identical to the current implementation, as verified by existing test suite"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1783 ms · ~2634 → 187 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["When `--dry-run` is provided, the script exits with status code 0 after printing all planned actions","When `--dry-run` is provided alongside other flags, the script still prints actions and does not execute any `gh` commands","When an invalid label name is encountered in dry-run mode, the script prints an error message and continues processing remaining labels","When `--dry-run` is used and the script encounters a network error while fetching existing labels, it logs the error but does not attempt any `gh` commands","When `--dry-run` is omitted, the script's output and side effects remain identical to the current implementation, as verified by existing test suite"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which modules or parts of the codebase besides the script are affected, lacking explicit technical context"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be created, the output includes the line `create <label-name>` and no external `gh` command is invoked",
    "Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be updated, the output includes the line `update <label-name>` and no external `gh` command is invoked",
    "When the script is run without `--dry-run`, it must invoke the appropriate `gh` commands for create and update operations and the existing test suite must still pass",
    "If the script encounters an error retrieving label information, it should log the error and abort without performing any `gh` commands, both with and without `--dry-run`",
    "When `--dry-run` is combined with the `--verbose` flag (if applicable), the script should still only print create/update lines and not execute any `gh` commands"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3930 ms · ~2634 → 262 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which modules or parts of the codebase besides the script are affected, lacking explicit technical context"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be created, the output includes the line `create <label-name>` and no external `gh` command is invoked","Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be updated, the output includes the line `update <label-name>` and no external `gh` command is invoked","When the script is run without `--dry-run`, it must invoke the appropriate `gh` commands for create and update operations and the existing test suite must still pass","If the script encounters an error retrieving label information, it should log the error and abort without performing any `gh` commands, both with and without `--dry-run`","When `--dry-run` is combined with the `--verbose` flag (if applicable), the script should still only print create/update lines and not execute any `gh` commands"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs --dry-run` with a label that does not exist, the output includes `create <label-name>` and no `gh` command is invoked",
    "When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs --dry-run` with a label that already exists, the output includes `update <label-name>` and no `gh` command is invoked",
    "When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs` without `--dry-run`, the script invokes the appropriate `gh` commands for creating and updating labels as verified by the existing test suite",
    "If the `--dry-run` flag is provided together with an invalid option, the script exits with a non-zero status and prints an error message",
    "Running the script with `--dry-run` on an empty label list results in no output and no `gh` commands executed"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4313 ms · ~2634 → 207 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs --dry-run` with a label that does not exist, the output includes `create <label-name>` and no `gh` command is invoked","When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs --dry-run` with a label that already exists, the output includes `update <label-name>` and no `gh` command is invoked","When running `scripts/manage_labels.mjs` without `--dry-run`, the script invokes the appropriate `gh` commands for creating and updating labels as verified by the existing test suite","If the `--dry-run` flag is provided together with an invalid option, the script exits with a non-zero status and prints an error message","Running the script with `--dry-run` on an empty label list results in no output and no `gh` commands executed"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view",
    "The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px",
    "The dashboard must render all charts with a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for text and background colors"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2273 ms · ~2596 → 152 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view","The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px","The dashboard must render all charts with a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for text and background colors"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view",
    "The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px",
    "The dashboard must render a line chart widget that correctly plots provided data points and shows tooltips on hover"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1592 ms · ~2596 → 154 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view","The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px","The dashboard must render a line chart widget that correctly plots provided data points and shows tooltips on hover"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view",
    "The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px",
    "The dashboard must render all charts with a minimum resolution of 800x600 pixels and no visual artifacts"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2149 ms · ~2596 → 151 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement request"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI must include a header with the title \"Eval Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current view","The dashboard must display a responsive grid of widgets that rearranges to a single column on screens narrower than 600px","The dashboard must render all charts with a minimum resolution of 800x600 pixels and no visual artifacts"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: AC item \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and lacks a measurable threshold"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "A 502 or 503 on POST /labels is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the total elapsed retry time does not exceed 5 seconds",
    "A 422 (label exists) is not retried and the implementation falls back to PATCH, preserving the original label metadata",
    "After 3 failed retries the thrown error includes the label name and the final HTTP status code",
    "When the network request times out, the function retries with the same backoff policy and reports a timeout error after exhaustion",
    "The test suite asserts that the total duration of retries for a 502 response is under 5 seconds to ensure CI speed"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21560 ms · ~2699 → 199 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: AC item \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and lacks a measurable threshold"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["A 502 or 503 on POST /labels is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the total elapsed retry time does not exceed 5 seconds","A 422 (label exists) is not retried and the implementation falls back to PATCH, preserving the original label metadata","After 3 failed retries the thrown error includes the label name and the final HTTP status code","When the network request times out, the function retries with the same backoff policy and reports a timeout error after exhaustion","The test suite asserts that the total duration of retries for a 502 response is under 5 seconds to ensure CI speed"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and lacks a measurable threshold"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which modules or components beyond the script file are affected"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a 502 response from POST /labels, ensure the request is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the final response is returned",
    "Given a 503 response from POST /labels, ensure the request is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the final response is returned",
    "Given a 422 response from POST /labels, ensure no retry occurs and the code falls back to a PATCH request to update the existing label",
    "When retries are exhausted after 3 attempts, the thrown error must include the label name and the last HTTP status code",
    "The test suite must include unit tests that simulate 502, 503, 422 responses and verify correct retry behavior and error handling"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5225 ms · ~2699 → 249 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and lacks a measurable threshold"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which modules or components beyond the script file are affected"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a 502 response from POST /labels, ensure the request is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the final response is returned","Given a 503 response from POST /labels, ensure the request is retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and the final response is returned","Given a 422 response from POST /labels, ensure no retry occurs and the code falls back to a PATCH request to update the existing label","When retries are exhausted after 3 attempts, the thrown error must include the label name and the last HTTP status code","The test suite must include unit tests that simulate 502, 503, 422 responses and verify correct retry behavior and error handling"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a 502 response from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries the request up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and ultimately succeeds if a retry returns 201",
    "Given a 503 response from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries up to 3 times with exponential backoff and fails with an error that includes the label name and the last status code after exhaustion",
    "Given a 422 response from POST /labels because the label already exists, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and instead issues a PATCH request to update the label",
    "Given a network timeout or non‑5xx error (e.g., 404) from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and propagates the original error",
    "Given the retry backoff exceeds 2 seconds total, when ensureLabel() is executed in CI, then the overall script execution time remains under the CI timeout threshold"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5559 ms · ~2699 → 253 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a 502 response from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries the request up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and ultimately succeeds if a retry returns 201","Given a 503 response from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries up to 3 times with exponential backoff and fails with an error that includes the label name and the last status code after exhaustion","Given a 422 response from POST /labels because the label already exists, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and instead issues a PATCH request to update the label","Given a network timeout or non‑5xx error (e.g., 404) from POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and propagates the original error","Given the retry backoff exceeds 2 seconds total, when ensureLabel() is executed in CI, then the overall script execution time remains under the CI timeout threshold"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The implementation depends on the metrics ingestion service which does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- [ ] The script returns an error and does not crash if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code",
    "- [ ] The script retries sending the summary up to 3 times on network failures before giving up",
    "- [ ] The summary JSON is validated against a schema and the script logs a warning if required fields are missing",
    "- [ ] When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the failure in a local log file",
    "- [ ] The script includes a unit test that simulates a 500 Internal Server Error response from the ingestion service and verifies proper error handling"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4212 ms · ~2663 → 195 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The implementation depends on the metrics ingestion service which does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- [ ] The script returns an error and does not crash if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code","- [ ] The script retries sending the summary up to 3 times on network failures before giving up","- [ ] The summary JSON is validated against a schema and the script logs a warning if required fields are missing","- [ ] When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the failure in a local log file","- [ ] The script includes a unit test that simulates a 500 Internal Server Error response from the ingestion service and verifies proper error handling"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The issue depends on a metrics ingestion service that does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The summary JSON is sent to the ingestion endpoint and the request receives HTTP 202 on success",
    "If the ingestion service returns a non‑202 status (e.g., 500), the script logs an error and exits with a non‑zero code",
    "If the HTTP request times out, the script retries up to 3 times before failing",
    "The script validates that the JSON payload contains all required fields (runId, stage, durationMs, outcome) and fails if any are missing",
    "When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the failure in a local log file for later inspection"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3985 ms · ~2663 → 185 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The issue depends on a metrics ingestion service that does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The summary JSON is sent to the ingestion endpoint and the request receives HTTP 202 on success","If the ingestion service returns a non‑202 status (e.g., 500), the script logs an error and exits with a non‑zero code","If the HTTP request times out, the script retries up to 3 times before failing","The script validates that the JSON payload contains all required fields (runId, stage, durationMs, outcome) and fails if any are missing","When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the failure in a local log file for later inspection"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The ingestion service is referenced as being built by the platform team but no existing endpoint, mock, or stub is provided, creating an undocumented external dependency."
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script returns an error and does not retry if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code",
    "The script logs and continues without failure if the ingestion service is unreachable (e.g., network error)",
    "The JSON payload includes all required fields and validates against the schema defined at `src/schemas/metrics.json`",
    "The script sends the summary exactly once per run even if multiple stages are executed",
    "The script handles and logs malformed responses from the ingestion service without crashing"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2881 ms · ~2663 → 193 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The ingestion service is referenced as being built by the platform team but no existing endpoint, mock, or stub is provided, creating an undocumented external dependency."],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script returns an error and does not retry if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code","The script logs and continues without failure if the ingestion service is unreachable (e.g., network error)","The JSON payload includes all required fields and validates against the schema defined at `src/schemas/metrics.json`","The script sends the summary exactly once per run even if multiple stages are executed","The script handles and logs malformed responses from the ingestion service without crashing"]}