Run 39260535854-validation · validation ✕ Fail per_class.invalid.recall, consistency

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) are not specified and may need to return 405"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "DELETE /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test file test/health.test.mjs includes unit tests for GET returning 200 with correct body and headers, and for POST, PUT, DELETE returning 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1078 ms · ~2624 → 150 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) are not specified and may need to return 405"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type header set to application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","DELETE /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test file test/health.test.mjs includes unit tests for GET returning 200 with correct body and headers, and for POST, PUT, DELETE returning 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "DELETE /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test suite in test/health.test.mjs verifies the GET response body, status code, Content-Type, and that all non-GET methods return 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1129 ms · ~2624 → 142 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – other HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE, etc.) should also return 405"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type header set to application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","DELETE /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test suite in test/health.test.mjs verifies the GET response body, status code, Content-Type, and that all non-GET methods return 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Issue does not specify behavior for HTTP methods other than GET and POST (e.g., PUT, DELETE)"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json",
    "POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "PUT /health (and any other non-GET/POST methods) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "A test file test/health.test.mjs includes separate test cases for GET success, POST 405, and an unsupported method (e.g., PUT) returning 405"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2122 ms · ~2624 → 138 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Issue does not specify behavior for HTTP methods other than GET and POST (e.g., PUT, DELETE)"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /health returns HTTP 200 with JSON body {\"status\":\"ok\"} and Content-Type: application/json","POST /health returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","PUT /health (and any other non-GET/POST methods) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","A test file test/health.test.mjs includes separate test cases for GET success, POST 405, and an unsupported method (e.g., PUT) returning 405"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not reference existing code context or indicate whether a similar helper already exists"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Hello-World') returns 'hello-world' (idempotent operation)",
    "slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (Unicode characters are normalized to ASCII)",
    "slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are preserved)",
    "slugify('   spaced   out   ') returns 'spaced-out' (leading/trailing whitespace is trimmed and collapsed)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (undefined input is handled like null)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3409 ms · ~2627 → 147 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not reference existing code context or indicate whether a similar helper already exists"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Hello-World') returns 'hello-world' (idempotent operation)","slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait' (Unicode characters are normalized to ASCII)","slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are preserved)","slugify('   spaced   out   ') returns 'spaced-out' (leading/trailing whitespace is trimmed and collapsed)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (undefined input is handled like null)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not describe the broader context or existing implementation details for the strings library"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'",
    "slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world'",
    "slugify('123_ABC') returns '123-abc'",
    "slugify('   ') returns '' (empty string after trimming)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3668 ms · ~2627 → 105 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not describe the broader context or existing implementation details for the strings library"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Café au lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'","slugify('---Hello---World---') returns 'hello-world'","slugify('123_ABC') returns '123-abc'","slugify('   ') returns '' (empty string after trimming)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Hello-World') returns 'hello-world' (consecutive hyphens collapse)",
    "slugify('  Leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (whitespace trimmed and collapsed)",
    "slugify('Café') returns 'cafe' (non-ASCII characters are normalized)",
    "slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are preserved)",
    "slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (undefined input is rejected)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20245 ms · ~2627 → 114 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Hello-World') returns 'hello-world' (consecutive hyphens collapse)","slugify('  Leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (whitespace trimmed and collapsed)","slugify('Café') returns 'cafe' (non-ASCII characters are normalized)","slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are preserved)","slugify(undefined) throws TypeError (undefined input is rejected)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://example.com/path:with:colons')` when parsed, then it returns `{ url: 'https://example.com/path:with:colons' }`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('key_without_value:')` when parsed, then it returns `{ key_without_value: '' }`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('')` when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('nested: { inner: value }')` when parsed, then it returns `{ nested: '{ inner: value }' }`",
    "Existing test suite `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` runs without failures after the change"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2998 ms · ~2634 → 158 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://example.com/path:with:colons')` when parsed, then it returns `{ url: 'https://example.com/path:with:colons' }`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('key_without_value:')` when parsed, then it returns `{ key_without_value: '' }`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('')` when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('nested: { inner: value }')` when parsed, then it returns `{ nested: '{ inner: value }' }`","Existing test suite `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` runs without failures after the change"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as empty input, null values, or whitespace-only strings are not covered in the acceptance criteria"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the input string \"url: https://x.dev\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"url\" and value \"https://x.dev\"",
    "Given an input string \"key:\" (key with no value), when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"key\" and an empty string value",
    "Given an empty string input, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an empty object",
    "Given an input string with leading/trailing whitespace such as \"  name: Alice  \", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it trims whitespace and returns { name: \"Alice\" }",
    "Given an input string containing multiple colons in the value like \"path: C:\\\\folder\\\\file:version\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it correctly captures the full value after the first colon"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21938 ms · ~2634 → 243 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as empty input, null values, or whitespace-only strings are not covered in the acceptance criteria"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the input string \"url: https://x.dev\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"url\" and value \"https://x.dev\"","Given an input string \"key:\" (key with no value), when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an object with the key \"key\" and an empty string value","Given an empty string input, when parseFlatYaml is called, then it returns an empty object","Given an input string with leading/trailing whitespace such as \"  name: Alice  \", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it trims whitespace and returns { name: \"Alice\" }","Given an input string containing multiple colons in the value like \"path: C:\\\\folder\\\\file:version\", when parseFlatYaml is called, then it correctly captures the full value after the first colon"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://example.com/path:8080')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ url: 'https://example.com/path:8080' }`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('key:')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ key: '' }`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('')`, when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`",
    "Given input `parseFlatYaml('nested: value\\nanother: test')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ nested: 'value', another: 'test' }`",
    "Given the existing test suite in `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` runs, then all original tests pass without modification"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4338 ms · ~2634 → 158 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given input `parseFlatYaml('url: https://example.com/path:8080')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ url: 'https://example.com/path:8080' }`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('key:')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ key: '' }`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('')`, when parsed, then it returns an empty object `{}`","Given input `parseFlatYaml('nested: value\\nanother: test')`, when parsed, then it returns `{ nested: 'value', another: 'test' }`","Given the existing test suite in `scripts/tests/yaml.test.mjs` runs, then all original tests pass without modification"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview",
    "The mermaid diagram includes exactly the nodes: Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge, and the directed edges Issue Validation->Code Generation, Code Generation->PR Review, PR Review->Auto-fix, Auto-fix->PR Review, Auto-fix->Human Merge",
    "The mermaid block does not contain any syntax errors; a CI step that runs `markdownlint` with the mermaid plugin passes",
    "No existing content in README.md outside the ## Pipeline section is changed (verified by diff against the previous commit)",
    "If the mermaid diagram fails to render, the CI pipeline fails and reports the rendering error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 23507 ms · ~2649 → 223 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview","The mermaid diagram includes exactly the nodes: Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge, and the directed edges Issue Validation->Code Generation, Code Generation->PR Review, PR Review->Auto-fix, Auto-fix->PR Review, Auto-fix->Human Merge","The mermaid block does not contain any syntax errors; a CI step that runs `markdownlint` with the mermaid plugin passes","No existing content in README.md outside the ## Pipeline section is changed (verified by diff against the previous commit)","If the mermaid diagram fails to render, the CI pipeline fails and reports the rendering error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid syntax errors or rendering failures are not explicitly covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a `## Pipeline` section with a fenced mermaid code block (` ```mermaid `) that renders without syntax errors",
    "The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly: Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge",
    "Directed edges exist in the order Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review is present",
    "No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the `## Pipeline` section and its mermaid block",
    "GitHub renders the mermaid diagram correctly in the README preview (no broken image or raw code display)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1200 ms · ~2649 → 204 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid syntax errors or rendering failures are not explicitly covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a `## Pipeline` section with a fenced mermaid code block (` ```mermaid `) that renders without syntax errors","The mermaid diagram includes nodes labeled exactly: Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge","Directed edges exist in the order Issue Validation → Code Generation → PR Review → Auto-fix → PR Review → Human Merge, and an additional edge Auto-fix → PR Review is present","No other content in README.md is changed besides the addition of the `## Pipeline` section and its mermaid block","GitHub renders the mermaid diagram correctly in the README preview (no broken image or raw code display)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview",
    "The mermaid diagram includes exactly five nodes labeled Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge and renders the specified directed edges in the correct order",
    "The mermaid block does not contain any syntax errors; a test parsing the block with a mermaid CLI should succeed",
    "No existing content in README.md outside the new ## Pipeline section is changed, verified by a diff against the previous version"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5347 ms · ~2649 → 178 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as Mermaid rendering failures or syntax errors are not addressed"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["README.md contains a ## Pipeline section with a fenced mermaid code block that renders without errors in GitHub preview","The mermaid diagram includes exactly five nodes labeled Issue Validation, Code Generation, PR Review, Auto-fix, Human Merge and renders the specified directed edges in the correct order","The mermaid block does not contain any syntax errors; a test parsing the block with a mermaid CLI should succeed","No existing content in README.md outside the new ## Pipeline section is changed, verified by a diff against the previous version"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that loading the model configuration via `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object with `maxTokens` equal to 1536.",
    "- Ensure that the `validation_max_tokens` entry in `config/models.yaml` is exactly 1536 and no other fields in the file are altered after the change.",
    "- Add a test that attempts to load a malformed `models.yaml` (e.g., missing `validation_max_tokens`) and confirms that a clear error is thrown, ensuring the new default does not mask configuration errors."
  ]
}

call 1 · 21092 ms · ~2630 → 141 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that loading the model configuration via `loadLLMConfig('validation')` returns an object with `maxTokens` equal to 1536.","- Ensure that the `validation_max_tokens` entry in `config/models.yaml` is exactly 1536 and no other fields in the file are altered after the change.","- Add a test that attempts to load a malformed `models.yaml` (e.g., missing `validation_max_tokens`) and confirms that a clear error is thrown, ensuring the new default does not mask configuration errors."]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that after the change, `loadLLMConfig('validation').maxTokens` returns 1536 and `loadLLMConfig('default').maxTokens` remains unchanged",
    "- Ensure that the YAML file `config/models.yaml` is still valid YAML and can be parsed without errors",
    "- Confirm that no other keys or values in `config/models.yaml` are modified compared to the original file (e.g., using a diff check)",
    "- Run the full test suite and verify that all existing tests still pass after the change",
    "- Validate that the `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` test asserts the exact value 1536 and fails if the value differs"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22044 ms · ~2630 → 167 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that after the change, `loadLLMConfig('validation').maxTokens` returns 1536 and `loadLLMConfig('default').maxTokens` remains unchanged","- Ensure that the YAML file `config/models.yaml` is still valid YAML and can be parsed without errors","- Confirm that no other keys or values in `config/models.yaml` are modified compared to the original file (e.g., using a diff check)","- Run the full test suite and verify that all existing tests still pass after the change","- Validate that the `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` test asserts the exact value 1536 and fails if the value differs"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which environments or deployment steps need to be updated after changing the config file"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that after the change, `loadLLMConfig('validation').maxTokens` returns 1536 for both Node.js and browser environments",
    "- Ensure that other model configurations in `config/models.yaml` retain their original `validation_max_tokens` values",
    "- Confirm that the YAML file remains syntactically valid and can be parsed without errors",
    "- Add a test that loading the entire configuration does not throw and that the `validation` section reflects the updated token limit",
    "- Verify that the change does not affect the default token limits for non‑validation models"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2023 ms · ~2630 → 190 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which environments or deployment steps need to be updated after changing the config file"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that after the change, `loadLLMConfig('validation').maxTokens` returns 1536 for both Node.js and browser environments","- Ensure that other model configurations in `config/models.yaml` retain their original `validation_max_tokens` values","- Confirm that the YAML file remains syntactically valid and can be parsed without errors","- Add a test that loading the entire configuration does not throw and that the `validation` section reflects the updated token limit","- Verify that the change does not affect the default token limits for non‑validation models"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- [ ] When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path",
    "- [ ] When the file exists but the process lacks read permissions, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path",
    "- [ ] When the file contains valid JSON but includes extra whitespace or newline characters, `readCheckpoint` returns the correctly parsed object unchanged",
    "- [ ] When `logger.error` is called, it includes the exact error message \"Corrupt checkpoint JSON\" along with the file path",
    "- [ ] The test suite includes a test that verifies no exception is thrown for any of the above scenarios"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20646 ms · ~2648 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- [ ] When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path","- [ ] When the file exists but the process lacks read permissions, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path","- [ ] When the file contains valid JSON but includes extra whitespace or newline characters, `readCheckpoint` returns the correctly parsed object unchanged","- [ ] When `logger.error` is called, it includes the exact error message \"Corrupt checkpoint JSON\" along with the file path","- [ ] The test suite includes a test that verifies no exception is thrown for any of the above scenarios"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as permission errors or unreadable files are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "When the file exists but is unreadable (e.g., permission denied), `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path",
    "When the file is missing, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` without logging an error",
    "When the file contains invalid JSON, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs exactly one warning containing the file path",
    "When the file contains valid JSON, `readCheckpoint` returns an object deeply equal to the parsed JSON and does not log any warnings",
    "When the file contains valid JSON, the returned object is a new instance (no reference to internal mutable state)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21127 ms · ~2648 → 192 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as permission errors or unreadable files are not addressed"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["When the file exists but is unreadable (e.g., permission denied), `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path","When the file is missing, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` without logging an error","When the file contains invalid JSON, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs exactly one warning containing the file path","When the file contains valid JSON, `readCheckpoint` returns an object deeply equal to the parsed JSON and does not log any warnings","When the file contains valid JSON, the returned object is a new instance (no reference to internal mutable state)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path",
    "When the file cannot be read due to a filesystem permission error, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path and error message",
    "When the file contains valid JSON but does not match the expected checkpoint schema, `readCheckpoint` returns the parsed object unchanged (schema validation is not performed)",
    "When `readCheckpoint` is called with a directory path instead of a file, it returns `null` and logs an error indicating the path is not a file"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21105 ms · ~2648 → 169 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["When the file exists but is empty, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs a warning via `logger.error` with the file path","When the file cannot be read due to a filesystem permission error, `readCheckpoint` returns `null` and logs an error with the file path and error message","When the file contains valid JSON but does not match the expected checkpoint schema, `readCheckpoint` returns the parsed object unchanged (schema validation is not performed)","When `readCheckpoint` is called with a directory path instead of a file, it returns `null` and logs an error indicating the path is not a file"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a toggle in the user settings UI that enables dark mode and persists the preference across sessions",
    "When dark mode is enabled, all primary UI components render with a dark color palette meeting WCAG AA contrast ratios",
    "When dark mode is disabled, the UI reverts to the default light color palette",
    "The system stores the user's dark mode preference in the database and applies it on login for both web and mobile clients",
    "If an unsupported browser is detected, the UI falls back to the light theme and logs a warning"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21139 ms · ~2541 → 182 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a toggle in the user settings UI that enables dark mode and persists the preference across sessions","When dark mode is enabled, all primary UI components render with a dark color palette meeting WCAG AA contrast ratios","When dark mode is disabled, the UI reverts to the default light color palette","The system stores the user's dark mode preference in the database and applies it on login for both web and mobile clients","If an unsupported browser is detected, the UI falls back to the light theme and logs a warning"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings",
    "When the user enables dark mode, the background color of all pages must be #121212 and text color must be #E0E0E0, verified via visual regression test",
    "The system must persist the user's dark mode preference across sessions using a cookie or local storage, and the preference must be applied on page load"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1822 ms · ~2541 → 156 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings","When the user enables dark mode, the background color of all pages must be #121212 and text color must be #E0E0E0, verified via visual regression test","The system must persist the user's dark mode preference across sessions using a cookie or local storage, and the preference must be applied on page load"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 45,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a generic request without specifying behavior or fallback"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings, and verify that the background color contrast meets WCAG AA standards",
    "When the user toggles the dark mode switch, the application persists the preference in local storage and loads the dark theme on subsequent visits, verified by checking the stored value and rendered theme after a page reload",
    "If the user has no explicit theme preference, the UI defaults to the system color scheme preference, verified by mocking different system preferences and asserting the rendered theme"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19298 ms · ~2541 → 224 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a generic request without specifying behavior or fallback"],"score":45,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a CSS class or theme variable that switches the UI to dark colors when a user selects \"Dark Mode\" in settings, and verify that the background color contrast meets WCAG AA standards","When the user toggles the dark mode switch, the application persists the preference in local storage and loads the dark theme on subsequent visits, verified by checking the stored value and rendered theme after a page reload","If the user has no explicit theme preference, the UI defaults to the system color scheme preference, verified by mocking different system preferences and asserting the rendered theme"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (\"Fix the bug\", \"It should work correctly\")"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected files or components"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and the user is redirected to the dashboard",
    "Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is displayed",
    "Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username is required\" is displayed",
    "Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the system retries up to 2 times and ultimately returns a 503 error with message \"Service unavailable\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 19528 ms · ~2557 → 242 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (\"Fix the bug\", \"It should work correctly\")"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected files or components"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and the user is redirected to the dashboard","Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is displayed","Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username is required\" is displayed","Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the system retries up to 2 times and ultimately returns a 503 error with message \"Service unavailable\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable",
    "B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned",
    "Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is returned",
    "Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username required\" is returned",
    "Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 503 and an error message \"Service unavailable\" is returned",
    "Given a rate limit exceeded scenario, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 429 and an error message \"Too many attempts, try later\" is returned"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4676 ms · ~2557 → 289 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable","B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned","Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is returned","Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username required\" is returned","Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 503 and an error message \"Service unavailable\" is returned","Given a rate limit exceeded scenario, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 429 and an error message \"Too many attempts, try later\" is returned"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable",
    "B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned",
    "Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is returned",
    "Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username required\" is returned",
    "Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 503 and an error message \"Service unavailable\" is returned",
    "Given a rate limit exceeded scenario, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 429 and an error message \"Too many attempts, try later\" is returned"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20442 ms · ~2557 → 289 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Fix the bug\" is non-testable","B2: AC item \"It should work correctly\" is non-testable"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context or affected components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid username and password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 200 and a session token is returned","Given an invalid password, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 401 and an error message \"Invalid credentials\" is returned","Given a missing username field, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 400 and an error message \"Username required\" is returned","Given a network timeout during authentication, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 503 and an error message \"Service unavailable\" is returned","Given a rate limit exceeded scenario, when the user submits the login form, then the response status is 429 and an error message \"Too many attempts, try later\" is returned"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 20,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable and subjective"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context or affected components specified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a user navigates to the Settings page, when the page loads, then the rendered HTML must include a <header> element with the text \"Settings\"",
    "Given a user accesses the Settings page on a screen width of 1024px, when the page is fully rendered, then the main container must have a CSS class \"modern\" and the background color must be #FFFFFF",
    "Given a user interacts with the Settings page, when an invalid input is submitted in any form field, then the page must display an error message with the text \"Invalid input\""
  ]
}

call 1 · 4250 ms · ~2572 → 195 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable and subjective"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context or affected components specified"],"score":20,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a user navigates to the Settings page, when the page loads, then the rendered HTML must include a <header> element with the text \"Settings\"","Given a user accesses the Settings page on a screen width of 1024px, when the page is fully rendered, then the main container must have a CSS class \"modern\" and the background color must be #FFFFFF","Given a user interacts with the Settings page, when an invalid input is submitted in any form field, then the page must display an error message with the text \"Invalid input\""]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context or affected components beyond the file path are provided",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a logged‑in user, when they navigate to /settings, then the page renders a header element with text \"Settings\"",
    "Given a logged‑in user, when they submit the settings form with valid data, then the API returns 200 and the UI displays a success toast",
    "Given a logged‑in user, when the Settings page loads, then the total time to first paint is under 1 second on a 3G connection",
    "Given a logged‑in user, when the Settings page is rendered on a screen narrower than 600px, then the layout collapses to a single‑column responsive design"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20005 ms · ~2572 → 251 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable","B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable","B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context or affected components beyond the file path are provided","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a logged‑in user, when they navigate to /settings, then the page renders a header element with text \"Settings\"","Given a logged‑in user, when they submit the settings form with valid data, then the API returns 200 and the UI displays a success toast","Given a logged‑in user, when the Settings page loads, then the total time to first paint is under 1 second on a 3G connection","Given a logged‑in user, when the Settings page is rendered on a screen narrower than 600px, then the layout collapses to a single‑column responsive design"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable",
    "B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or components beyond the page path are referenced",
    "W2: No edge cases or error states are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a logged‑in user visits /settings, the page renders without errors and includes a header element with text \"Settings\"",
    "When the page loads on a viewport width of 1024px, the main container has a CSS width of at most 800px and uses the CSS class \"modern-layout\"",
    "When a user interacts with the theme toggle control, the page updates the CSS variable \"--background-color\" within 200ms",
    "Given an empty user profile, the settings form displays placeholder values and the submit button remains disabled",
    "When the page is accessed on a mobile viewport (≤480px), the layout switches to a single‑column design and all interactive elements remain reachable"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4744 ms · ~2572 → 278 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"The page looks modern and clean\" is subjective and not testable","B2: \"Users find it intuitive\" is subjective and not testable","B2: \"It feels responsive\" is subjective and not testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or components beyond the page path are referenced","W2: No edge cases or error states are described"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a logged‑in user visits /settings, the page renders without errors and includes a header element with text \"Settings\"","When the page loads on a viewport width of 1024px, the main container has a CSS width of at most 800px and uses the CSS class \"modern-layout\"","When a user interacts with the theme toggle control, the page updates the CSS variable \"--background-color\" within 200ms","Given an empty user profile, the settings form displays placeholder values and the submit button remains disabled","When the page is accessed on a mobile viewport (≤480px), the layout switches to a single‑column design and all interactive elements remain reachable"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 30,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or code context beyond script name",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR with 200 changed files completes in under 3 seconds",
    "Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR with 0 changed files completes in under 1 second and exits with status 0",
    "Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR that triggers a merge conflict returns an error message containing \"conflict\" within 2 seconds"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3154 ms · ~2562 → 171 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable","B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or code context beyond script name","W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"],"score":30,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR with 200 changed files completes in under 3 seconds","Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR with 0 changed files completes in under 1 second and exits with status 0","Running `scripts/pr_review.mjs` on a PR that triggers a merge conflict returns an error message containing \"conflict\" within 2 seconds"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non-testable",
    "B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non-testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files or code context"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR with 500 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 5 seconds",
    "Given a PR with 0 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 1 second",
    "Given a PR with 1000 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 8 seconds"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5207 ms · ~2562 → 148 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non-testable","B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non-testable"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files or code context"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR with 500 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 5 seconds","Given a PR with 0 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 1 second","Given a PR with 1000 lines of diff, when the review script runs, then it completes in under 8 seconds"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or code locations are specified beyond the script name",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` must complete processing of a PR with 500 changed files in under 5 seconds on the CI runner",
    "The script must log the total execution time and the test suite must assert that it is ≤5 s for the benchmark dataset",
    "If the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it must finish in under 1 second and exit with status 0"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21216 ms · ~2562 → 180 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: \"Review should be faster\" is non‑testable","B2: \"Better performance overall\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or code locations are specified beyond the script name","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script `scripts/pr_review.mjs` must complete processing of a PR with 500 changed files in under 5 seconds on the CI runner","The script must log the total execution time and the test suite must assert that it is ≤5 s for the benchmark dataset","If the script receives an empty PR (no changed files), it must finish in under 1 second and exit with status 0"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 65,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – AC does not specify which responses or endpoints should be cached, making implementation choices unclear"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected modules, services, or cache layer is identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no criteria for cache eviction, TTL, or handling of cache misses"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a GET request to /api/data, when the request is made for the first time, then the response should be stored in the cache and subsequent identical requests within 5 minutes should return the cached response with status 200",
    "Given a GET request to /api/data, when the cache entry has expired after its TTL, then the request should be processed normally and the cache refreshed with the new response",
    "Given a request to an uncached endpoint, when the request is made, then the system should not return a cached value and should store the response for future requests",
    "Given a request that results in an error (e.g., 500), when the request is cached, then the error response should not be stored in the cache"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20934 ms · ~2564 → 276 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – AC does not specify which responses or endpoints should be cached, making implementation choices unclear"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected modules, services, or cache layer is identified","W2: Edge cases not covered – no criteria for cache eviction, TTL, or handling of cache misses"],"score":65,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a GET request to /api/data, when the request is made for the first time, then the response should be stored in the cache and subsequent identical requests within 5 minutes should return the cached response with status 200","Given a GET request to /api/data, when the cache entry has expired after its TTL, then the request should be processed normally and the cache refreshed with the new response","Given a request to an uncached endpoint, when the request is made, then the system should not return a cached value and should store the response for future requests","Given a request that results in an error (e.g., 500), when the request is cached, then the error response should not be stored in the cache"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses/endpoints should be cached, cache size, TTL, or eviction policy."
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files, modules, or components are identified."
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a GET request to /api/items, when the response is returned, then the response body must be stored in the cache with a TTL of 60 seconds.",
    "Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/items within the TTL, when the request is processed, then the service must return the cached response without invoking the underlying data source.",
    "Given a GET request to /api/items after the TTL has expired, when the request is processed, then the service must fetch a fresh response, store it in the cache, and return it.",
    "Given a cache miss for any endpoint, when the request is processed, then the service must log a cache miss event and proceed to fetch the data normally.",
    "Given the cache reaches its maximum size of 100 entries, when a new entry is added, then the least-recently-used entry must be evicted."
  ]
}

call 1 · 4854 ms · ~2564 → 277 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses/endpoints should be cached, cache size, TTL, or eviction policy."],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files, modules, or components are identified."],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a GET request to /api/items, when the response is returned, then the response body must be stored in the cache with a TTL of 60 seconds.","Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/items within the TTL, when the request is processed, then the service must return the cached response without invoking the underlying data source.","Given a GET request to /api/items after the TTL has expired, when the request is processed, then the service must fetch a fresh response, store it in the cache, and return it.","Given a cache miss for any endpoint, when the request is processed, then the service must log a cache miss event and proceed to fetch the data normally.","Given the cache reaches its maximum size of 100 entries, when a new entry is added, then the least-recently-used entry must be evicted."]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or components should be cached, leading to multiple possible implementations"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected modules, services, or cache layer is identified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a GET request to /api/items, when the response is generated, then the response body and status code are stored in the cache with a key based on the request URL and query parameters",
    "Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/items, when the cache contains a valid entry, then the service returns the cached response without invoking the underlying data source",
    "Given a GET request to /api/items that results in a 404, when the response is cached, then a cache miss for a later request should not return the 404 but re-evaluate the request",
    "Given a GET request to /api/items with a Cache-Control: no-cache header, when the request is processed, then the service bypasses the cache and fetches a fresh response",
    "Given a cached entry older than the configured TTL (e.g., 5 minutes), when a request for the same resource arrives, then the cache is refreshed by fetching a new response and updating the stored value"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20434 ms · ~2564 → 309 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – the issue does not specify which responses or components should be cached, leading to multiple possible implementations"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected modules, services, or cache layer is identified"],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a GET request to /api/items, when the response is generated, then the response body and status code are stored in the cache with a key based on the request URL and query parameters","Given a subsequent identical GET request to /api/items, when the cache contains a valid entry, then the service returns the cached response without invoking the underlying data source","Given a GET request to /api/items that results in a 404, when the response is cached, then a cache miss for a later request should not return the 404 but re-evaluate the request","Given a GET request to /api/items with a Cache-Control: no-cache header, when the request is processed, then the service bypasses the cache and fetches a fresh response","Given a cached entry older than the configured TTL (e.g., 5 minutes), when a request for the same resource arrives, then the cache is refreshed by fetching a new response and updating the stored value"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (\"Metrics survive a restart\", \"Metrics can be queried\")"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No technical context such as affected modules or storage implementation details",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a running pipeline, when it records a metric, then the metric is persisted in PostgreSQL and a query to SELECT * FROM metrics returns the recorded value after the service restarts",
    "Given a running pipeline, when it records a metric, then the metric is persisted in Redis and a query via the provided API returns the recorded value after the service restarts",
    "Given an invalid metric payload, when the ingestion endpoint receives it, then the service returns a 400 Bad Request error and does not store any data"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3162 ms · ~2577 → 223 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (\"Metrics survive a restart\", \"Metrics can be queried\")"],"warnings":["W1: No technical context such as affected modules or storage implementation details","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a running pipeline, when it records a metric, then the metric is persisted in PostgreSQL and a query to SELECT * FROM metrics returns the recorded value after the service restarts","Given a running pipeline, when it records a metric, then the metric is persisted in Redis and a query via the provided API returns the recorded value after the service restarts","Given an invalid metric payload, when the ingestion endpoint receives it, then the service returns a 400 Bad Request error and does not store any data"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 15,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable",
    "B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named",
    "W2: No error or edge‑case conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a running pipeline, when the service restarts, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the chosen storage backend",
    "Given stored metrics, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics with valid authentication, then the response returns a JSON array containing all metric records with correct fields",
    "Given an empty metrics store, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics, then the response returns an empty array with HTTP 200",
    "Given a request to /api/metrics with an invalid query parameter, when the request is processed, then the service returns HTTP 400 with an error message"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4481 ms · ~2577 → 239 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: Acceptance criteria are vague and not concrete","B2: AC item \"Metrics survive a restart\" is non‑testable","B2: AC item \"Metrics can be queried\" is non‑testable"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files, modules, or components are named","W2: No error or edge‑case conditions are described"],"score":15,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a running pipeline, when the service restarts, then previously recorded metrics are still present in the chosen storage backend","Given stored metrics, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics with valid authentication, then the response returns a JSON array containing all metric records with correct fields","Given an empty metrics store, when a GET request is made to /api/metrics, then the response returns an empty array with HTTP 200","Given a request to /api/metrics with an invalid query parameter, when the request is processed, then the service returns HTTP 400 with an error message"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 10,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No concrete acceptance criteria; items are vague",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (e.g., \"Metrics survive a restart\" is subjective)",
    "B3: Ambiguous storage choice – unclear whether to implement with Postgres, Redis, or both"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Metrics persisted in PostgreSQL table `pipeline_metrics` survive a service restart and are still retrievable via GET /metrics",
    "Metrics persisted in Redis survive a service restart and are still retrievable via GET /metrics",
    "GET /metrics returns 200 with a JSON array of all stored metrics when metrics exist",
    "GET /metrics for a non‑existent metric returns 404"
  ]
}

call 1 · 24258 ms · ~2577 → 171 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No concrete acceptance criteria; items are vague","B2: Acceptance criteria items are non-testable (e.g., \"Metrics survive a restart\" is subjective)","B3: Ambiguous storage choice – unclear whether to implement with Postgres, Redis, or both"],"warnings":[],"score":10,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Metrics persisted in PostgreSQL table `pipeline_metrics` survive a service restart and are still retrievable via GET /metrics","Metrics persisted in Redis survive a service restart and are still retrievable via GET /metrics","GET /metrics returns 200 with a JSON array of all stored metrics when metrics exist","GET /metrics for a non‑existent metric returns 404"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Slack message appearance in #dev-loop is non‑testable and depends on external Slack integration",
    "B4: The notifier service is not deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR review event, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it calls the notifier service with a JSON payload containing the fields `prNumber` (integer) and `verdict` (string)",
    "Given the notifier service returns a 200 OK response, when the call succeeds, then the system logs a success message and no error is thrown",
    "Given the notifier service returns a non‑200 response or times out, when the call fails, then pr_review.mjs retries up to 3 times and logs an error after the final failure",
    "Given a PR review event with missing `verdict` data, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it does not call the notifier and returns a validation error"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4634 ms · ~2613 → 228 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Slack message appearance in #dev-loop is non‑testable and depends on external Slack integration","B4: The notifier service is not deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract"],"warnings":[],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR review event, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it calls the notifier service with a JSON payload containing the fields `prNumber` (integer) and `verdict` (string)","Given the notifier service returns a 200 OK response, when the call succeeds, then the system logs a success message and no error is thrown","Given the notifier service returns a non‑200 response or times out, when the call fails, then pr_review.mjs retries up to 3 times and logs an error after the final failure","Given a PR review event with missing `verdict` data, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it does not call the notifier and returns a validation error"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Slack message appearance in #dev-loop cannot be verified without a real Slack integration",
    "B4: Notifier service endpoint does not exist and no mock or stub is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "pr_review.mjs calls the notifier service with a payload containing the PR number and verdict, verified by a unit test using a mocked notifier",
    "When the notifier service returns a successful response, a Slack message with the text \"Review #<prNumber>: <verdict>\" is sent to the #dev-loop channel, verified by asserting the mock Slack client receives the expected message",
    "If the notifier service returns an error, pr_review.mjs logs the error and does not attempt to send a Slack message, verified by checking the log output and that no Slack message is sent",
    "pr_review.mjs does not call the notifier when the input verdict is null or undefined, verified by ensuring the mock notifier is not invoked",
    "The notifier call is made asynchronously and the function resolves only after the notifier promise settles, verified by testing the promise resolution order"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1438 ms · ~2613 → 278 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Slack message appearance in #dev-loop cannot be verified without a real Slack integration","B4: Notifier service endpoint does not exist and no mock or stub is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["pr_review.mjs calls the notifier service with a payload containing the PR number and verdict, verified by a unit test using a mocked notifier","When the notifier service returns a successful response, a Slack message with the text \"Review #<prNumber>: <verdict>\" is sent to the #dev-loop channel, verified by asserting the mock Slack client receives the expected message","If the notifier service returns an error, pr_review.mjs logs the error and does not attempt to send a Slack message, verified by checking the log output and that no Slack message is sent","pr_review.mjs does not call the notifier when the input verdict is null or undefined, verified by ensuring the mock notifier is not invoked","The notifier call is made asynchronously and the function resolves only after the notifier promise settles, verified by testing the promise resolution order"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is non‑testable and depends on external Slack integration",
    "B4: The notifier service is not deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract, creating an undocumented external dependency"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a PR review, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it calls the notifier service with a payload containing the PR number and verdict (verified via a mock of the notifier)",
    "Given a successful notifier call, when the mock returns a Slack payload, then the system logs that a message would be posted to #dev-loop with the correct content",
    "Given the notifier service returns an error, when pr_review.mjs processes a review, then the function handles the error gracefully and logs a warning without throwing"
  ]
}

call 1 · 7330 ms · ~2613 → 211 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"A Slack message appears in #dev-loop\" is non‑testable and depends on external Slack integration","B4: The notifier service is not deployed and has no published endpoint or API contract, creating an undocumented external dependency"],"warnings":[],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a PR review, when pr_review.mjs processes it, then it calls the notifier service with a payload containing the PR number and verdict (verified via a mock of the notifier)","Given a successful notifier call, when the mock returns a Slack payload, then the system logs that a message would be posted to #dev-loop with the correct content","Given the notifier service returns an error, when pr_review.mjs processes a review, then the function handles the error gracefully and logs a warning without throwing"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or logging framework mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the fields timestamp, user_id, and source_ip",
    "Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query exceeds 500ms, including query string and execution time",
    "Add a log entry at ERROR level when an unhandled exception occurs, capturing exception type, message, stack trace, and request ID"
  ]
}

call 1 · 16027 ms · ~2537 → 156 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or logging framework mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a log entry at INFO level when a user successfully authenticates, containing the fields timestamp, user_id, and source_ip","Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query exceeds 500ms, including query string and execution time","Add a log entry at ERROR level when an unhandled exception occurs, capturing exception type, message, stack trace, and request ID"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The logging system writes an INFO level entry to the application log file when a user successfully completes a login operation",
    "The logging system writes an ERROR level entry with stack trace to the error log when an unhandled exception is thrown in the payment processing module",
    "The logging system includes a timestamp in ISO 8601 format and the request ID in each log entry for all HTTP requests",
    "The logging system does not write any log entries for health check endpoint requests (GET /health)",
    "The logging system writes a WARN level entry when a deprecated API endpoint is called"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2050 ms · ~2537 → 211 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The logging system writes an INFO level entry to the application log file when a user successfully completes a login operation","The logging system writes an ERROR level entry with stack trace to the error log when an unhandled exception is thrown in the payment processing module","The logging system includes a timestamp in ISO 8601 format and the request ID in each log entry for all HTTP requests","The logging system does not write any log entries for health check endpoint requests (GET /health)","The logging system writes a WARN level entry when a deprecated API endpoint is called"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified",
    "W2: Edge cases not addressed – no error handling or performance considerations described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Add a log entry at INFO level when the user authentication succeeds, containing the user ID and timestamp",
    "Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query fails, including the query string and error message, and ensure the function returns an appropriate error response",
    "Ensure that all log messages are written in JSON format with fields: timestamp, level, message, and context, and verify that the log file does not exceed 5 MB per day"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19591 ms · ~2537 → 184 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files, modules, or components are identified","W2: Edge cases not addressed – no error handling or performance considerations described"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Add a log entry at INFO level when the user authentication succeeds, containing the user ID and timestamp","Add a log entry at WARN level when a database query fails, including the query string and error message, and ensure the function returns an appropriate error response","Ensure that all log messages are written in JSON format with fields: timestamp, level, message, and context, and verify that the log file does not exceed 5 MB per day"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message \"Maximum attempts reached\"",
    "When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits are pushed to the PR and the workflow exits with status code 1",
    "If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow pushes a single commit and increments the counter stored in `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs`",
    "The workflow must record the number of attempts in a persistent location (e.g., a comment on the PR) and ensure it is reset after a successful fix"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2643 ms · ~2577 → 187 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message \"Maximum attempts reached\"","When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits are pushed to the PR and the workflow exits with status code 1","If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow pushes a single commit and increments the counter stored in `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs`","The workflow must record the number of attempts in a persistent location (e.g., a comment on the PR) and ensure it is reset after a successful fix"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message \"max attempts reached\"",
    "When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits should be pushed to the PR and the workflow should exit with status code 1",
    "If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow should push a commit and increment the counter, then exit with status code 0",
    "The workflow must record the number of attempts in a persistent location (e.g., a comment on the PR or a temporary file) that survives across workflow runs"
  ]
}

call 1 · 20374 ms · ~2577 → 189 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing detailed technical context about expected behavior and limits"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow must stop after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and log a warning message \"max attempts reached\"","When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits should be pushed to the PR and the workflow should exit with status code 1","If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow should push a commit and increment the counter, then exit with status code 0","The workflow must record the number of attempts in a persistent location (e.g., a comment on the PR or a temporary file) that survives across workflow runs"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The auto-fix workflow stops after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and logs a warning message \"Maximum attempts reached\"",
    "When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits are pushed to the PR and the workflow exits with status code 1",
    "If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow pushes a single commit and increments the counter stored in `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs`",
    "The workflow records the final attempt count in the job summary and it matches the number of commits pushed for the PR"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1921 ms · ~2577 → 161 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":[],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The auto-fix workflow stops after a maximum of 5 attempts for a given PR and logs a warning message \"Maximum attempts reached\"","When the attempt counter reaches the limit, no further commits are pushed to the PR and the workflow exits with status code 1","If the attempt counter is below the limit, the workflow pushes a single commit and increments the counter stored in `scripts/auto_fix_pr.mjs`","The workflow records the final attempt count in the job summary and it matches the number of commits pushed for the PR"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – no acceptance criteria for successful loading of a valid labels.yaml"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid labels.yaml file, when loadLabels() is called, then it returns an array of label objects with correct name and color properties",
    "Given a labels.yaml file missing the `color` field, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error with a message indicating the missing `color` and the line number",
    "Given a labels.yaml file containing duplicate label names, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error listing all duplicate name occurrences"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22130 ms · ~2648 → 160 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases not covered – no acceptance criteria for successful loading of a valid labels.yaml"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid labels.yaml file, when loadLabels() is called, then it returns an array of label objects with correct name and color properties","Given a labels.yaml file missing the `color` field, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error with a message indicating the missing `color` and the line number","Given a labels.yaml file containing duplicate label names, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error listing all duplicate name occurrences"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a labels.yaml file with a label entry missing the `name` field, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error with a message that includes the line number of the offending entry",
    "Given a labels.yaml file containing a label whose `color` value is not exactly six hexadecimal digits, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error mentioning the label name and the invalid color value",
    "Given a labels.yaml file that defines two or more labels with the same `name`, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error listing all line numbers where the duplicate names occur",
    "Given a labels.yaml file that is empty or contains no label entries, when loadLabels() is called, then it returns an empty array without throwing an Error",
    "Given a labels.yaml file with invalid YAML syntax, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws a parsing Error consistent with the existing error style in scripts/lib/"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2086 ms · ~2648 → 249 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a labels.yaml file with a label entry missing the `name` field, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error with a message that includes the line number of the offending entry","Given a labels.yaml file containing a label whose `color` value is not exactly six hexadecimal digits, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error mentioning the label name and the invalid color value","Given a labels.yaml file that defines two or more labels with the same `name`, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws an Error listing all line numbers where the duplicate names occur","Given a labels.yaml file that is empty or contains no label entries, when loadLabels() is called, then it returns an empty array without throwing an Error","Given a labels.yaml file with invalid YAML syntax, when loadLabels() is called, then it throws a parsing Error consistent with the existing error style in scripts/lib/"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "A label with an empty string for `name` throws `Error` with a message indicating the name cannot be empty",
    "A label with a `color` value containing non-hex characters throws `Error` specifying the invalid characters",
    "An empty `labels.yaml` file does not throw an error and results in an empty label list",
    "A label entry missing both `name` and `color` throws `Error` mentioning both missing fields",
    "A label with additional unexpected fields does not affect validation and is ignored"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22303 ms · ~2648 → 140 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["A label with an empty string for `name` throws `Error` with a message indicating the name cannot be empty","A label with a `color` value containing non-hex characters throws `Error` specifying the invalid characters","An empty `labels.yaml` file does not throw an error and results in an empty label list","A label entry missing both `name` and `color` throws `Error` mentioning both missing fields","A label with additional unexpected fields does not affect validation and is ignored"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable performance bounds"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which modules or tests need to be updated beyond the mentioned script"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string",
    "Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call’s result",
    "Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a directory containing at least 10,000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes in under 200 ms on the CI test runner"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2979 ms · ~2635 → 235 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable performance bounds"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which modules or tests need to be updated beyond the mentioned script"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string","Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call’s result","Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with the message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a directory containing at least 10,000 prompt files, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes in under 200 ms on the CI test runner"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable criteria"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No explicit mention of affected modules beyond the file path, but acceptable"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a valid prompt name, when loadPrompt is called twice, then fs.readFileSync is invoked only on the first call and the returned strings are identical",
    "Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then the function throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a prompt directory containing 10,000 files, when loadPrompt is called for a prompt, then the call completes in under 200 ms",
    "Given an empty string as the prompt name, when loadPrompt is called, then the function throws an error indicating an invalid prompt name",
    "Given concurrent calls to loadPrompt with the same name, when both calls complete, then fs.readFileSync is invoked only once and both calls return the same cached string"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4531 ms · ~2635 → 252 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable criteria"],"warnings":["W1: No explicit mention of affected modules beyond the file path, but acceptable"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a valid prompt name, when loadPrompt is called twice, then fs.readFileSync is invoked only on the first call and the returned strings are identical","Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then the function throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a prompt directory containing 10,000 files, when loadPrompt is called for a prompt, then the call completes in under 200 ms","Given an empty string as the prompt name, when loadPrompt is called, then the function throws an error indicating an invalid prompt name","Given concurrent calls to loadPrompt with the same name, when both calls complete, then fs.readFileSync is invoked only once and both calls return the same cached string"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable performance metric"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as concurrent calls or cache invalidation are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string",
    "Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call",
    "Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"",
    "Given a large prompt directory, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes in under 500 ms on the CI environment"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3942 ms · ~2635 → 222 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Loading works for large prompt directories without timing out\" is non‑testable and lacks measurable performance metric"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as concurrent calls or cache invalidation are not addressed"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given a prompt name, when loadPrompt is called the first time, then it reads the file using fs.readFileSync and returns the file contents as a string","Given the same prompt name, when loadPrompt is called a second time, then fs.readFileSync is not invoked and the returned string is identical to the first call","Given a non‑existent prompt file, when loadPrompt is called, then it throws an error with message \"Prompt file not found\"","Given a large prompt directory, when loadPrompt is called for a valid prompt, then the call completes in under 500 ms on the CI environment"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not defined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are used for ranking"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "searchReports(query) returns results sorted by descending score field from each report",
    "When no reports match the query, searchReports(query) returns an empty array",
    "searchReports(query) throws TypeError if query is not a string",
    "searchReports(query) returns at most 10 items; if more matches exist, only the top 10 by score are returned",
    "searchReports(query) does not include duplicate issueNumber entries in the result set"
  ]
}

call 1 · 23217 ms · ~2637 → 176 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not defined"],"warnings":["W1: No description of how relevance is calculated or which fields are used for ranking"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["searchReports(query) returns results sorted by descending score field from each report","When no reports match the query, searchReports(query) returns an empty array","searchReports(query) throws TypeError if query is not a string","searchReports(query) returns at most 10 items; if more matches exist, only the top 10 by score are returned","searchReports(query) does not include duplicate issueNumber entries in the result set"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as null or non‑string query inputs are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "searchReports('') throws TypeError when called with an empty string",
    "searchReports(null) throws TypeError when called with null input",
    "searchReports('example') returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields",
    "searchReports('example') returns results sorted in descending order by score, ensuring the most relevant reports appear first",
    "searchReports('nonexistent') returns an empty array when no reports match the query"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5116 ms · ~2637 → 185 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as null or non‑string query inputs are not addressed"],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["searchReports('') throws TypeError when called with an empty string","searchReports(null) throws TypeError when called with null input","searchReports('example') returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields","searchReports('example') returns results sorted in descending order by score, ensuring the most relevant reports appear first","searchReports('nonexistent') returns an empty array when no reports match the query"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: AC item \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No description of how relevance is determined or which fields are used for ranking",
    "W2: No edge cases such as queries with no matches or queries that match more than 10 reports are covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given an empty string query, calling searchReports('') throws a TypeError",
    "Given a non‑empty query, searchReports returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields",
    "Given a query that matches more than 10 reports, searchReports returns the 10 reports with the highest score values (score field is defined as the number of keyword matches in the report)",
    "Given a query that matches fewer than 10 reports, searchReports returns all matching reports sorted by descending score",
    "Given a query that matches no reports, searchReports returns an empty array"
  ]
}

call 1 · 23338 ms · ~2637 → 250 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: AC item \"The 10 most relevant reports for the query are returned\" is non‑testable because relevance is not quantified"],"warnings":["W1: No description of how relevance is determined or which fields are used for ranking","W2: No edge cases such as queries with no matches or queries that match more than 10 reports are covered"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Given an empty string query, calling searchReports('') throws a TypeError","Given a non‑empty query, searchReports returns an array of at most 10 objects each containing numeric issueNumber and numeric score fields","Given a query that matches more than 10 reports, searchReports returns the 10 reports with the highest score values (score field is defined as the number of keyword matches in the report)","Given a query that matches fewer than 10 reports, searchReports returns all matching reports sorted by descending score","Given a query that matches no reports, searchReports returns an empty array"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because \"all common models\" is undefined"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which files or code sections need to be modified beyond the script path"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- The report includes a line \"Total tokens: X\" where X equals the sum of `tokens_est` across all test cases",
    "- For each test case the report includes a line \"Case <name>: Y tokens\" where Y matches the `tokens_est` value for that case",
    "- When `tokens_est` is 0 the generated Markdown does not contain the `## Coût` section",
    "- The cost in USD is calculated using the per‑token price defined for each model (e.g., `gpt-3.5-turbo: $0.00002 per token`, `gpt-4: $0.00003 per token`) and the report shows both the token count and the dollar amount",
    "- A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the generated Markdown contains the correct token totals, per‑case values, omission when zero, and correct dollar calculations for at least two known models"
  ]
}

call 1 · 7137 ms · ~2634 → 275 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Le coût en dollars est calculé pour tous les modèles courants\" is non‑testable because \"all common models\" is undefined"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which files or code sections need to be modified beyond the script path"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- The report includes a line \"Total tokens: X\" where X equals the sum of `tokens_est` across all test cases","- For each test case the report includes a line \"Case <name>: Y tokens\" where Y matches the `tokens_est` value for that case","- When `tokens_est` is 0 the generated Markdown does not contain the `## Coût` section","- The cost in USD is calculated using the per‑token price defined for each model (e.g., `gpt-3.5-turbo: $0.00002 per token`, `gpt-4: $0.00003 per token`) and the report shows both the token count and the dollar amount","- A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the generated Markdown contains the correct token totals, per‑case values, omission when zero, and correct dollar calculations for at least two known models"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The generated Markdown report includes a `## Coût` section that lists the total `tokens_est` and a breakdown per test case when `tokens_est` > 0",
    "The `## Coût` section is omitted entirely when `tokens_est` equals 0",
    "The cost in USD is calculated using the official pricing for each model listed in `src/pricing.json` (or equivalent) and displayed with two decimal places",
    "A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the `## Coût` section appears with correct token counts and dollar amounts for a sample model",
    "A unit test verifies that when `tokens_est` is 0 the report contains no `## Coût` heading and no cost lines"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19831 ms · ~2634 → 180 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The generated Markdown report includes a `## Coût` section that lists the total `tokens_est` and a breakdown per test case when `tokens_est` > 0","The `## Coût` section is omitted entirely when `tokens_est` equals 0","The cost in USD is calculated using the official pricing for each model listed in `src/pricing.json` (or equivalent) and displayed with two decimal places","A unit test in `scripts/tests/eval_harness.test.mjs` asserts that the `## Coût` section appears with correct token counts and dollar amounts for a sample model","A unit test verifies that when `tokens_est` is 0 the report contains no `## Coût` heading and no cost lines"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a successful eval run with non‑zero token usage, the generated Markdown report includes a `## Coût` section displaying the total `tokens_est` and a per‑case breakdown of token counts",
    "Given an eval run where `tokens_est` equals 0, the generated Markdown report does NOT contain a `## Coût` section",
    "Given an eval run using any supported model, the `## Coût` section shows the cost in USD calculated with the correct per‑token rate for that model",
    "Given an eval run with an unknown or unsupported model, the `## Coût` section falls back to a default rate and includes a comment indicating the fallback",
    "Given an eval run where `tokens_est` is negative or missing, the `## Coût` section is omitted and the test suite fails with a clear error message"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2624 ms · ~2634 → 208 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a successful eval run with non‑zero token usage, the generated Markdown report includes a `## Coût` section displaying the total `tokens_est` and a per‑case breakdown of token counts","Given an eval run where `tokens_est` equals 0, the generated Markdown report does NOT contain a `## Coût` section","Given an eval run using any supported model, the `## Coût` section shows the cost in USD calculated with the correct per‑token rate for that model","Given an eval run with an unknown or unsupported model, the `## Coût` section falls back to a default rate and includes a comment indicating the fallback","Given an eval run where `tokens_est` is negative or missing, the `## Coût` section is omitted and the test suite fails with a clear error message"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which authentication/authorization mechanism or middleware is used for member management, making implementation context unclear"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an empty array when the project has no members",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed roles (e.g., \"owner\", \"contributor\")",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for a user lacking the \"manage_members\" permission",
    "DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when the specified userId is not a member of the project"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4324 ms · ~2671 → 173 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which authentication/authorization mechanism or middleware is used for member management, making implementation context unclear"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 200 with an empty array when the project has no members","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed roles (e.g., \"owner\", \"contributor\")","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for a user lacking the \"manage_members\" permission","DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 404 when the specified userId is not a member of the project"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which authentication/authorization mechanism determines who is allowed to manage members"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project with :id does not exist",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed enum values",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with the updated member object when a permitted user changes the role",
    "DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 204 with no content on successful removal of an existing member"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22828 ms · ~2671 → 159 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which authentication/authorization mechanism determines who is allowed to manage members"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project with :id does not exist","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role value is not one of the allowed enum values","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 200 with the updated member object when a permitted user changes the role","DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 204 with no content on successful removal of an existing member"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context such as authentication mechanism and role definitions",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered, e.g., invalid role payload, non‑existent project handling"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project does not exist",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role is not one of the allowed values",
    "PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for users without the \"manage members\" permission",
    "DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for users without the \"manage members\" permission",
    "GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 403 for users without read access to the project"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22231 ms · ~2671 → 183 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context such as authentication mechanism and role definitions","W2: Edge cases not covered, e.g., invalid role payload, non‑existent project handling"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 404 when the project does not exist","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 400 when the provided role is not one of the allowed values","PATCH /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for users without the \"manage members\" permission","DELETE /api/projects/:id/members/:userId returns 403 for users without the \"manage members\" permission","GET /api/projects/:id/members returns 403 for users without read access to the project"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" not defined which role(s) are allowed (org_admin, project_admin, or both)"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /api/audit/export returns 200 with CSV body when request is made by a user with the org_admin role",
    "GET /api/audit/export returns 403 when request is made by a user with the project_admin role",
    "GET /api/audit/export returns 403 when request is made by a user with the member role",
    "GET /api/audit/export returns 401 when request is made without authentication",
    "Automated tests verify that the response CSV includes headers and at least one audit record for a successful admin request"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2872 ms · ~2652 → 168 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous scope – \"Admins\" not defined which role(s) are allowed (org_admin, project_admin, or both)"],"warnings":[],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["GET /api/audit/export returns 200 with CSV body when request is made by a user with the org_admin role","GET /api/audit/export returns 403 when request is made by a user with the project_admin role","GET /api/audit/export returns 403 when request is made by a user with the member role","GET /api/audit/export returns 401 when request is made without authentication","Automated tests verify that the response CSV includes headers and at least one audit record for a successful admin request"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 80,
  "blockers": [
    "B3: Ambiguous definition of \"Admins\" – unclear whether org_admin, project_admin, or both should have access"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Admins (org_admin role) receive a 200 response with a CSV body when calling GET /api/audit/export",
    "Project admins receive a 403 response when calling GET /api/audit/export",
    "Unauthenticated requests receive a 401 response when calling GET /api/audit/export",
    "When the audit log is empty, the CSV body is still returned with only header rows",
    "Error response includes a JSON error object with fields \"error\" and \"message\" for 403 and 401 cases"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4797 ms · ~2652 → 158 tokens

{"blockers":["B3: Ambiguous definition of \"Admins\" – unclear whether org_admin, project_admin, or both should have access"],"warnings":[],"score":80,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Admins (org_admin role) receive a 200 response with a CSV body when calling GET /api/audit/export","Project admins receive a 403 response when calling GET /api/audit/export","Unauthenticated requests receive a 401 response when calling GET /api/audit/export","When the audit log is empty, the CSV body is still returned with only header rows","Error response includes a JSON error object with fields \"error\" and \"message\" for 403 and 401 cases"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as empty audit log, large export size, or malformed request parameters are not addressed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Admins receive a 200 response with Content-Type 'text/csv' and a non‑empty CSV body containing all audit entries for the organization",
    "Authenticated non‑admin users receive a 403 response with an error message indicating insufficient permissions",
    "Unauthenticated requests receive a 401 response with a WWW-Authenticate header",
    "When the audit log is empty, the CSV response still returns 200 with only header rows and no data rows",
    "If the request includes an unsupported query parameter, the endpoint returns a 400 Bad Request"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2522 ms · ~2652 → 178 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as empty audit log, large export size, or malformed request parameters are not addressed"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Admins receive a 200 response with Content-Type 'text/csv' and a non‑empty CSV body containing all audit entries for the organization","Authenticated non‑admin users receive a 403 response with an error message indicating insufficient permissions","Unauthenticated requests receive a 401 response with a WWW-Authenticate header","When the audit log is empty, the CSV response still returns 200 with only header rows and no data rows","If the request includes an unsupported query parameter, the endpoint returns a 400 Bad Request"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which configuration files or code locations need to be modified to enforce LOG_LEVEL in deployed environments"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files",
    "Running the test suite fails if any deployed environment configuration file contains LOG_LEVEL other than \"info\"",
    "The application startup logs do not contain request bodies when LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" in deployed environments",
    "The test script scripts/tests/config.test.mjs includes a test case that verifies LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" for each deployed environment configuration file"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3407 ms · ~2618 → 170 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which configuration files or code locations need to be modified to enforce LOG_LEVEL in deployed environments"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml files","Running the test suite fails if any deployed environment configuration file contains LOG_LEVEL other than \"info\"","The application startup logs do not contain request bodies when LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" in deployed environments","The test script scripts/tests/config.test.mjs includes a test case that verifies LOG_LEVEL is \"info\" for each deployed environment configuration file"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading code or deployment scripts need to be modified"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files",
    "`local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` unchanged",
    "Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which verifies that each environment file contains the expected LOG_LEVEL value",
    "A CI pipeline step fails if any deployed environment file does not have LOG_LEVEL set to `info`",
    "Documentation in README is updated to explain that only local development uses `debug` logging"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5012 ms · ~2618 → 164 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which configuration loading code or deployment scripts need to be modified"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files","`local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` unchanged","Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which verifies that each environment file contains the expected LOG_LEVEL value","A CI pipeline step fails if any deployed environment file does not have LOG_LEVEL set to `info`","Documentation in README is updated to explain that only local development uses `debug` logging"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not reference the specific configuration loading code or deployment scripts that need to be changed"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files",
    "`local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` and no other environment file contains `debug`",
    "Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which fails if any deployed environment file does not have `LOG_LEVEL: info`",
    "Deployment scripts (e.g., CI/CD pipeline) do not override `LOG_LEVEL` to a value other than `info` for preview, staging, or production environments",
    "If a new environment file is added (e.g., `qa.yaml`), the default `LOG_LEVEL` must be `info` unless explicitly set to `debug` in a local development file"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19146 ms · ~2618 → 204 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not reference the specific configuration loading code or deployment scripts that need to be changed"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files","`local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` and no other environment file contains `debug`","Running `npm test` executes `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` which fails if any deployed environment file does not have `LOG_LEVEL: info`","Deployment scripts (e.g., CI/CD pipeline) do not override `LOG_LEVEL` to a value other than `info` for preview, staging, or production environments","If a new environment file is added (e.g., `qa.yaml`), the default `LOG_LEVEL` must be `info` unless explicitly set to `debug` in a local development file"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services read the LOG_LEVEL setting, limiting context for implementation"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `ci.yaml`, `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files",
    "- `local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` unchanged",
    "- `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` includes a test that loads each environment YAML and asserts the `LOG_LEVEL` value matches the expected setting",
    "- Adding a CI check that fails the build if any deployed environment YAML contains `LOG_LEVEL` other than `info`",
    "- Documentation in `README.md` is updated to explain that `LOG_LEVEL` should remain `debug` only in `local.yaml` and `info` elsewhere"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3553 ms · ~2621 → 189 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services read the LOG_LEVEL setting, limiting context for implementation"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- LOG_LEVEL is set to `info` in `ci.yaml`, `preview.yaml`, `staging.yaml`, and `production.yaml` files","- `local.yaml` retains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` unchanged","- `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` includes a test that loads each environment YAML and asserts the `LOG_LEVEL` value matches the expected setting","- Adding a CI check that fails the build if any deployed environment YAML contains `LOG_LEVEL` other than `info`","- Documentation in `README.md` is updated to explain that `LOG_LEVEL` should remain `debug` only in `local.yaml` and `info` elsewhere"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services read the LOG_LEVEL configuration, making the implementation location ambiguous"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- Verify that `config/env/ci.yaml`, `config/env/preview.yaml`, `config/env/staging.yaml`, and `config/env/production.yaml` each contain `LOG_LEVEL: info` after the change",
    "- Ensure that `config/env/local.yaml` still contains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` and is unchanged by the update",
    "- Add a unit test in `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` that loads each environment file and asserts the `LOG_LEVEL` value matches the expected setting for that environment",
    "- Run the CI pipeline and confirm it fails if any deployed environment file does not have `LOG_LEVEL: info`",
    "- Confirm that no other configuration keys are altered in any of the environment YAML files during the update"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4613 ms · ~2621 → 221 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which code components or services read the LOG_LEVEL configuration, making the implementation location ambiguous"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- Verify that `config/env/ci.yaml`, `config/env/preview.yaml`, `config/env/staging.yaml`, and `config/env/production.yaml` each contain `LOG_LEVEL: info` after the change","- Ensure that `config/env/local.yaml` still contains `LOG_LEVEL: debug` and is unchanged by the update","- Add a unit test in `scripts/tests/config.test.mjs` that loads each environment file and asserts the `LOG_LEVEL` value matches the expected setting for that environment","- Run the CI pipeline and confirm it fails if any deployed environment file does not have `LOG_LEVEL: info`","- Confirm that no other configuration keys are altered in any of the environment YAML files during the update"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml and a test verifies each file contains this value",
    "local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\" and a test confirms the value is unchanged",
    "Running the full test suite executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming the correct LOG_LEVEL per environment file"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2792 ms · ~2621 → 111 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["LOG_LEVEL is set to \"info\" in ci.yaml, preview.yaml, staging.yaml, and production.yaml and a test verifies each file contains this value","local.yaml retains LOG_LEVEL set to \"debug\" and a test confirms the value is unchanged","Running the full test suite executes scripts/tests/config.test.mjs and it passes, confirming the correct LOG_LEVEL per environment file"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No affected files or modules besides script path are referenced",
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero",
    "If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and omits the cost line without crashing",
    "Prices are cached and the pricing service is called at most once per script execution, verified by a mock call count in tests",
    "The cost calculation rounds to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts",
    "A test verifies that when the pricing service returns different per‑model prices, the cost reflects the correct model price"
  ]
}

call 1 · 22420 ms · ~2660 → 212 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W1: No affected files or modules besides script path are referenced","W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes `Cost: $0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero","If the pricing service request fails, the script logs an error and omits the cost line without crashing","Prices are cached and the pricing service is called at most once per script execution, verified by a mock call count in tests","The cost calculation rounds to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts","A test verifies that when the pricing service returns different per‑model prices, the cost reflects the correct model price"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service which is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (input_tokens × input_price_per_million + output_tokens × output_price_per_million) rounded to 4 decimal places",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, verified by mocking the pricing service and asserting a single request",
    "When the pricing service returns an error, the script logs a warning and omits the cost line from the comment",
    "The script correctly handles zero input or output tokens, resulting in a cost of $0.0000",
    "A test in `scripts/tests/pr_review.test.mjs` validates the cost line for 1,000 input and 500 output tokens and also for the zero‑token edge case"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5286 ms · ~2660 → 229 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service which is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (input_tokens × input_price_per_million + output_tokens × output_price_per_million) rounded to 4 decimal places","Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, verified by mocking the pricing service and asserting a single request","When the pricing service returns an error, the script logs a warning and omits the cost line from the comment","The script correctly handles zero input or output tokens, resulting in a cost of $0.0000","A test in `scripts/tests/pr_review.test.mjs` validates the cost line for 1,000 input and 500 output tokens and also for the zero‑token edge case"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on a pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment generated by scripts/pr_review.mjs includes a line matching the regex /Cost: \\$\\d+\\.\\d{4}/ with the correct calculation based on fetched prices",
    "The pricing service client is invoked exactly once per execution of scripts/pr_review.mjs, verified by a mock call count",
    "When the pricing service returns an error or missing price data, the comment includes \"Cost: unavailable\" and the script exits with a non‑zero status"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2797 ms · ~2660 → 153 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on a pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment generated by scripts/pr_review.mjs includes a line matching the regex /Cost: \\$\\d+\\.\\d{4}/ with the correct calculation based on fetched prices","The pricing service client is invoked exactly once per execution of scripts/pr_review.mjs, verified by a mock call count","When the pricing service returns an error or missing price data, the comment includes \"Cost: unavailable\" and the script exits with a non‑zero status"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to 4 decimal places",
    "If the pricing service returns an error or is unreachable, the script logs a warning and uses a fallback price of $0.0000 per million tokens",
    "When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution from that side",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple reviews are processed in the same run",
    "A test verifies that if the pricing endpoint returns different prices on subsequent calls, the script still uses the first fetched prices for the entire run"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5199 ms · ~2697 → 234 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens or pricing service failure are not covered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to 4 decimal places","If the pricing service returns an error or is unreachable, the script logs a warning and uses a fallback price of $0.0000 per million tokens","When inputTokens or outputTokens are zero, the cost calculation correctly reflects zero contribution from that side","Prices are fetched exactly once per script execution, even if multiple reviews are processed in the same run","A test verifies that if the pricing endpoint returns different prices on subsequent calls, the script still uses the first fetched prices for the entire run"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: No edge case coverage for pricing service failures or missing token data"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places",
    "If the pricing service request fails or returns an error, the script logs a warning and appics `Cost: N/A` in the comment",
    "The pricing service is queried exactly once per script execution, regardless of the number of models processed",
    "When the pricing contract returns missing fields, the script treats missing prices as 0 and still produces a valid cost line",
    "A test verifies that when the pricing endpoint returns a 500 error, the comment contains `Cost: N/A` and no unhandled exception is thrown"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5208 ms · ~2697 → 231 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Pricing service dependency is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: No edge case coverage for pricing service failures or missing token data"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens * inputPerMTok + outputTokens * outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places","If the pricing service request fails or returns an error, the script logs a warning and appics `Cost: N/A` in the comment","The pricing service is queried exactly once per script execution, regardless of the number of models processed","When the pricing contract returns missing fields, the script treats missing prices as 0 and still produces a valid cost line","A test verifies that when the pricing endpoint returns a 500 error, the comment contains `Cost: N/A` and no unhandled exception is thrown"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as pricing service failure or missing price data are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script logs an error and defaults cost to $0.00 if the pricing service request fails or returns invalid data",
    "The script validates that the fetched price fields `inputPerMTok` and `outputPerMTok` are numbers before calculating cost",
    "The comment includes the cost line even when token counts are zero, resulting in `Cost: $0.0000`",
    "If the pricing service returns a 404 for an unknown model, the script falls back to a default price of $0.0001 per MTok for both input and output"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6254 ms · ~2697 → 186 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: Implementation depends on pricing service that is not deployed and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as pricing service failure or missing price data are not covered"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The script logs an error and defaults cost to $0.00 if the pricing service request fails or returns invalid data","The script validates that the fetched price fields `inputPerMTok` and `outputPerMTok` are numbers before calculating cost","The comment includes the cost line even when token counts are zero, resulting in `Cost: $0.0000`","If the pricing service returns a 404 for an unknown model, the script falls back to a default price of $0.0001 per MTok for both input and output"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not list affected files or modules beyond informal mentions, missing technical context",
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and error handling for missing price data are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1e6 * inputPerMTok) + (outputTokens/1e6 * outputPerMTok) and rounded to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts, including zero tokens",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called a single time even when multiple comments could be generated in the same run",
    "When `getPrice` returns missing or undefined price fields, the script logs an error and falls back to a default price of 0.0, and the comment reflects a cost of $0.0000",
    "A test verifies correct cost calculation for large token counts (e.g., 10,000,000 input and 5,000,000 output tokens) ensuring no overflow or precision loss",
    "A test confirms that the cost line is omitted or shows `$0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5591 ms · ~2704 → 289 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not list affected files or modules beyond informal mentions, missing technical context","W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and error handling for missing price data are not covered"],"score":85,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1e6 * inputPerMTok) + (outputTokens/1e6 * outputPerMTok) and rounded to exactly 4 decimal places for any token counts, including zero tokens","Prices are fetched exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`; a test verifies that `getPrice` is called a single time even when multiple comments could be generated in the same run","When `getPrice` returns missing or undefined price fields, the script logs an error and falls back to a default price of 0.0, and the comment reflects a cost of $0.0000","A test verifies correct cost calculation for large token counts (e.g., 10,000,000 input and 5,000,000 output tokens) ensuring no overflow or precision loss","A test confirms that the cost line is omitted or shows `$0.0000` when both input and output token counts are zero"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, extremely large token counts, and pricing stub failures are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the cost is calculated as (inputTokens × inputPerMTok + outputTokens × outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places",
    "When inputTokens and outputTokens are both zero, the comment still includes `Cost: $0.0000`",
    "If `getPrice(model)` throws an error, the script logs the error and falls back to the stub prices `{ inputPerMTok: 0.15, outputPerMTok: 0.6 }` without crashing",
    "Prices are fetched exactly once per execution regardless of the number of models processed",
    "The test suite includes a case with 10,000,000 input tokens and 5,000,000 output tokens to verify correct handling of very large token counts"
  ]
}

call 1 · 4893 ms · ~2704 → 213 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, extremely large token counts, and pricing stub failures are not covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment ends with `Cost: $<usd>` where the cost is calculated as (inputTokens × inputPerMTok + outputTokens × outputPerMTok) / 1_000_000, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places","When inputTokens and outputTokens are both zero, the comment still includes `Cost: $0.0000`","If `getPrice(model)` throws an error, the script logs the error and falls back to the stub prices `{ inputPerMTok: 0.15, outputPerMTok: 0.6 }` without crashing","Prices are fetched exactly once per execution regardless of the number of models processed","The test suite includes a case with 10,000,000 input tokens and 5,000,000 output tokens to verify correct handling of very large token counts"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 95,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and error handling for pricing failures are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1e6)*inputPrice + (outputTokens/1e6)*outputPrice, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places, even when input or output tokens are zero",
    "Prices are retrieved by calling `getPrice` exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`, regardless of the number of models processed",
    "If `getPrice` throws an error, the comment should include `Cost: unavailable` and the script should exit with a non‑zero status code",
    "The test suite includes a case where inputTokens=0 and outputTokens=0 and verifies the cost line shows `$0.0000`",
    "The test suite includes a case with large token counts (e.g., 10,000,000 input and 5,000,000 output) and verifies correct rounding to 4 decimals"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5204 ms · ~2704 → 235 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as zero tokens, rounding behavior, and error handling for pricing failures are not covered"],"score":95,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The comment includes a line `Cost: $<usd>` where the amount is calculated as (inputTokens/1e6)*inputPrice + (outputTokens/1e6)*outputPrice, rounded to exactly 4 decimal places, even when input or output tokens are zero","Prices are retrieved by calling `getPrice` exactly once per execution of `pr_review.mjs`, regardless of the number of models processed","If `getPrice` throws an error, the comment should include `Cost: unavailable` and the script should exit with a non‑zero status code","The test suite includes a case where inputTokens=0 and outputTokens=0 and verifies the cost line shows `$0.0000`","The test suite includes a case with large token counts (e.g., 10,000,000 input and 5,000,000 output) and verifies correct rounding to 4 decimals"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague",
    "B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and correct UTF‑8 encoding for a valid request",
    "The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names defined in the data model",
    "When the dataset is empty, the export returns a CSV file with only the header row and HTTP 200 status",
    "If the request payload exceeds 10 000 rows, the export completes within 2 seconds and returns HTTP 202 with a processing ID",
    "When an internal error occurs, the export returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error object containing an \"error\" field"
  ]
}

call 1 · 5481 ms · ~2565 → 220 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria item \"Corriger le bug\" is non‑testable and vague","B2: Acceptance criteria item \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is non‑testable and vague"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and correct UTF‑8 encoding for a valid request","The exported CSV contains a header row matching the field names defined in the data model","When the dataset is empty, the export returns a CSV file with only the header row and HTTP 200 status","If the request payload exceeds 10 000 rows, the export completes within 2 seconds and returns HTTP 202 with a processing ID","When an internal error occurs, the export returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error object containing an \"error\" field"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Corriger le bug\" is vague and not testable",
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is vague and not testable"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and includes a header row matching the expected column names for a valid request",
    "Export CSV returns a 400 Bad Request error when the input data set is empty or missing required fields",
    "Export CSV completes the generation and download of a file with up to 10,000 rows in under 2 seconds on the CI test environment",
    "Export CSV logs an error and returns a 500 Internal Server Error if an unexpected exception occurs during processing",
    "Export CSV file content matches the source data values exactly for at least three representative records"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3370 ms · ~2565 → 232 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Corriger le bug\" is vague and not testable","B2: Acceptance criterion \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\" is vague and not testable"],"warnings":["W1: Issue provides no technical context such as affected modules or code locations"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns a file with MIME type text/csv and includes a header row matching the expected column names for a valid request","Export CSV returns a 400 Bad Request error when the input data set is empty or missing required fields","Export CSV completes the generation and download of a file with up to 10,000 rows in under 2 seconds on the CI test environment","Export CSV logs an error and returns a 500 Internal Server Error if an unexpected exception occurs during processing","Export CSV file content matches the source data values exactly for at least three representative records"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 70,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and non-testable (\"Corriger le bug\", \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\")"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue lacks technical context such as affected modules or code locations",
    "W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Export CSV endpoint returns a file with .csv extension and correct header row for a valid dataset",
    "Export CSV returns HTTP 200 and Content-Type \"text/csv\" for a request with valid parameters",
    "Export CSV returns a CSV file containing only the header row when the dataset is empty",
    "Export CSV returns HTTP 400 with an error message when required query parameters are missing or invalid",
    "Export CSV does not crash and logs an error when an internal exception occurs"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2555 ms · ~2565 → 200 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criteria items are vague and non-testable (\"Corriger le bug\", \"L'export doit fonctionner correctement\")"],"warnings":["W1: Issue lacks technical context such as affected modules or code locations","W2: No edge cases or error conditions are described"],"score":70,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Export CSV endpoint returns a file with .csv extension and correct header row for a valid dataset","Export CSV returns HTTP 200 and Content-Type \"text/csv\" for a request with valid parameters","Export CSV returns a CSV file containing only the header row when the dataset is empty","Export CSV returns HTTP 400 with an error message when required query parameters are missing or invalid","Export CSV does not crash and logs an error when an internal exception occurs"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The updated config/models.yaml must be valid YAML and parse without errors using the project's YAML loader",
    "All model entries in config/models.yaml must include the required fields: name, version, and path, and any missing fields cause a validation error",
    "Running the project's configuration validation script must report zero errors after the cleanup",
    "The git diff of config/models.yaml after the change must not exceed 500 lines added or removed",
    "The CI pipeline must pass all tests that load config/models.yaml without modification"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3700 ms · ~2540 → 188 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no files or components referenced beyond config/models.yaml"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The updated config/models.yaml must be valid YAML and parse without errors using the project's YAML loader","All model entries in config/models.yaml must include the required fields: name, version, and path, and any missing fields cause a validation error","Running the project's configuration validation script must report zero errors after the cleanup","The git diff of config/models.yaml after the change must not exceed 500 lines added or removed","The CI pipeline must pass all tests that load config/models.yaml without modification"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which parts of the codebase are affected or what the cleaned config should look like"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The config/models.yaml file is reformatted to use 2‑space indentation consistently",
    "All keys in config/models.yaml are sorted alphabetically at each nesting level",
    "No duplicate entries exist in config/models.yaml after cleanup",
    "The updated config/models.yaml passes the project's YAML schema validation without errors",
    "A git diff of config/models.yaml shows only whitespace and ordering changes, with no functional modifications"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19159 ms · ~2540 → 167 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which parts of the codebase are affected or what the cleaned config should look like"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The config/models.yaml file is reformatted to use 2‑space indentation consistently","All keys in config/models.yaml are sorted alphabetically at each nesting level","No duplicate entries exist in config/models.yaml after cleanup","The updated config/models.yaml passes the project's YAML schema validation without errors","A git diff of config/models.yaml shows only whitespace and ordering changes, with no functional modifications"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 60,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which parts of the codebase are affected or what the cleaned config should look like"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The config/models.yaml file is reformatted to use 2‑space indentation consistently",
    "All keys in config/models.yaml are sorted alphabetically at each nesting level",
    "No duplicate entries exist in config/models.yaml after cleanup",
    "The updated config/models.yaml passes the project's YAML schema validation without errors",
    "A git diff of config/models.yaml shows only whitespace and ordering changes, with no functional modifications"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1774 ms · ~2540 → 167 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which parts of the codebase are affected or what the cleaned config should look like"],"score":60,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The config/models.yaml file is reformatted to use 2‑space indentation consistently","All keys in config/models.yaml are sorted alphabetically at each nesting level","No duplicate entries exist in config/models.yaml after cleanup","The updated config/models.yaml passes the project's YAML schema validation without errors","A git diff of config/models.yaml shows only whitespace and ordering changes, with no functional modifications"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError",
    "formatDuration(-5) returns '-5s'",
    "formatDuration(1234) returns a string matching the pattern /\\d+[smhd]/",
    "formatDuration('10') returns '10s' (coerces string numeric input)",
    "formatDuration(undefined) returns '0s'"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3629 ms · ~2569 → 83 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError","formatDuration(-5) returns '-5s'","formatDuration(1234) returns a string matching the pattern /\\d+[smhd]/","formatDuration('10') returns '10s' (coerces string numeric input)","formatDuration(undefined) returns '0s'"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError\",\"formatDuration(undefined) throws a TypeError\",\"formatDuration(12345) returns a string ending with 's' representing the correct duration in seconds, minutes, or hours\",\"formatDuration(-5) returns a string with a leading '-' indicating negative duration, e.g., '-5s'\",\"formatDuration('1000') coerces the string to a number and returns the correct formatted duration"
  ]
}

call 1 · 18375 ms · ~2569 → 122 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError\",\"formatDuration(undefined) throws a TypeError\",\"formatDuration(12345) returns a string ending with 's' representing the correct duration in seconds, minutes, or hours\",\"formatDuration(-5) returns a string with a leading '-' indicating negative duration, e.g., '-5s'\",\"formatDuration('1000') coerces the string to a number and returns the correct formatted duration"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Issue only specifies behavior for input 0; other edge cases like negative or large values are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "formatDuration(12345) returns a string representing the duration in seconds, minutes, or hours as appropriate (e.g., '3h 25m 45s')",
    "formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError",
    "formatDuration(undefined) throws a TypeError",
    "formatDuration(-5) returns a string with a leading '-' indicating negative duration (e.g., '-5s')",
    "formatDuration(0) returns '0s' and the regression test asserts this behavior"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3837 ms · ~2569 → 146 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Issue only specifies behavior for input 0; other edge cases like negative or large values are not covered"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["formatDuration(12345) returns a string representing the duration in seconds, minutes, or hours as appropriate (e.g., '3h 25m 45s')","formatDuration(null) throws a TypeError","formatDuration(undefined) throws a TypeError","formatDuration(-5) returns a string with a leading '-' indicating negative duration (e.g., '-5s')","formatDuration(0) returns '0s' and the regression test asserts this behavior"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify('Café-au-lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'",
    "slugify('  Multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'",
    "slugify('123-ABC') returns '123-abc'",
    "slugify('---StartEnd---') returns 'startend'",
    "slugify('中文') returns '' (non‑ASCII characters are removed)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3037 ms · ~2633 → 83 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify('Café-au-lait') returns 'cafe-au-lait'","slugify('  Multiple   spaces  ') returns 'multiple-spaces'","slugify('123-ABC') returns '123-abc'","slugify('---StartEnd---') returns 'startend'","slugify('中文') returns '' (non‑ASCII characters are removed)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as null or non-string inputs are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify(null) throws a TypeError",
    "slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive separators collapsed to a single hyphen)",
    "slugify('  leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace and replaces spaces with hyphens)",
    "slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)",
    "slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles additional accented characters)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2129 ms · ~2633 → 131 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as null or non-string inputs are not covered"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify(null) throws a TypeError","slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive separators collapsed to a single hyphen)","slugify('  leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace and replaces spaces with hyphens)","slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)","slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles additional accented characters)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W2: Edge cases such as null or non-string inputs are not covered"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "slugify(null) throws a TypeError",
    "slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive separators collapsed)",
    "slugify('  leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace)",
    "slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)",
    "slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles other diacritics)"
  ]
}

call 1 · 21764 ms · ~2633 → 115 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W2: Edge cases such as null or non-string inputs are not covered"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["slugify(null) throws a TypeError","slugify('Café--Bar') returns 'cafe-bar' (consecutive separators collapsed)","slugify('  leading and trailing  ') returns 'leading-and-trailing' (trims whitespace)","slugify('123') returns '123' (numeric strings are unchanged)","slugify('ÄÖÜ') returns 'aou' (handles other diacritics)"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules where the endpoint should be added"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON { \"version\": \"<exact version string from package.json>\" } and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "GET /version with any HTTP method other than GET returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "GET /version returns HTTP 500 Internal Server Error if the version field cannot be read from package.json",
    "GET /version response body is valid JSON and the version field matches the semantic version pattern ^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"
  ]
}

call 1 · 18590 ms · ~2588 → 158 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules where the endpoint should be added"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON { \"version\": \"<exact version string from package.json>\" } and Content-Type header set to application/json","GET /version with any HTTP method other than GET returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","GET /version returns HTTP 500 Internal Server Error if the version field cannot be read from package.json","GET /version response body is valid JSON and the version field matches the semantic version pattern ^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules, nor where to implement the endpoint"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json",
    "GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "GET /version returns HTTP 500 with an error message if the version field cannot be read from package.json",
    "GET /version response body is valid JSON and conforms to the schema { \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": { \"version\": { \"type\": \"string\" } }, \"required\": [\"version\"] }"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2927 ms · ~2588 → 173 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules, nor where to implement the endpoint"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type header set to application/json","GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","GET /version returns HTTP 500 with an error message if the version field cannot be read from package.json","GET /version response body is valid JSON and conforms to the schema { \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": { \"version\": { \"type\": \"string\" } }, \"required\": [\"version\"] }"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 90,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules, nor where to implement the endpoint"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type: application/json",
    "GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed",
    "GET /version when package.json does not contain a version field returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON",
    "GET /version response body is valid JSON and the version field matches the semantic version pattern ^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"
  ]
}

call 1 · 19236 ms · ~2588 → 156 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify affected files or modules, nor where to implement the endpoint"],"score":90,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["GET /version returns HTTP 200 with JSON containing the exact version string from package.json and Content-Type: application/json","GET /version with an unsupported HTTP method (e.g., POST) returns HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed","GET /version when package.json does not contain a version field returns HTTP 500 with an error message in JSON","GET /version response body is valid JSON and the version field matches the semantic version pattern ^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be created, when the script processes the label, then it prints `create <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command",
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be updated, when the script processes the label, then it prints `update <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command",
    "Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag, when it processes labels, then it performs the same create/update operations as before and all existing tests in `scripts/tests/manage_labels.test.mjs` continue to pass",
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and the exec function throws an error, when processing labels, then the script propagates the error without performing any `gh` commands",
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and there are no label changes needed, when the script finishes, then it outputs nothing to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` commands"
  ]
}

call 1 · 7619 ms · ~2634 → 272 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be created, when the script processes the label, then it prints `create <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command","Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be updated, when the script processes the label, then it prints `update <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command","Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag, when it processes labels, then it performs the same create/update operations as before and all existing tests in `scripts/tests/manage_labels.test.mjs` continue to pass","Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and the exec function throws an error, when processing labels, then the script propagates the error without performing any `gh` commands","Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and there are no label changes needed, when the script finishes, then it outputs nothing to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` commands"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label does not exist, the output includes a line `create <label-name>` and no GitHub CLI command is invoked",
    "Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label already exists, the output includes a line `update <label-name>` and no GitHub CLI command is invoked",
    "Given the script is run without `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be created, the script invokes `gh label create` with the correct parameters and the label is created in the repository",
    "Given the script is run without `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be updated, the script invokes `gh label edit` with the correct parameters and the label is updated in the repository",
    "Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, if the exec function throws an error, the script propagates the error without attempting any further label operations"
  ]
}

call 1 · 17469 ms · ~2634 → 232 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label does not exist, the output includes a line `create <label-name>` and no GitHub CLI command is invoked","Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, when a label already exists, the output includes a line `update <label-name>` and no GitHub CLI command is invoked","Given the script is run without `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be created, the script invokes `gh label create` with the correct parameters and the label is created in the repository","Given the script is run without `--dry-run`, when a label needs to be updated, the script invokes `gh label edit` with the correct parameters and the label is updated in the repository","Given the script is run with `--dry-run`, if the exec function throws an error, the script propagates the error without attempting any further label operations"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be created, when the script processes the label, then it prints `create <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command",
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be updated, when the script processes the label, then it prints `update <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command",
    "Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag and a label operation fails (e.g., `gh` returns a non‑zero exit code), then the script propagates the error and exits with a non‑zero status",
    "Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and there are no label changes required, then it produces no output and does not invoke any `gh` command",
    "Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag and all label operations succeed, then the existing test suite `scripts/tests/manage_labels.test.mjs` passes"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2827 ms · ~2634 → 250 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be created, when the script processes the label, then it prints `create <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command","Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and a label needs to be updated, when the script processes the label, then it prints `update <label-name>` to stdout and does not invoke any `gh` command","Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag and a label operation fails (e.g., `gh` returns a non‑zero exit code), then the script propagates the error and exits with a non‑zero status","Given the script is run with the `--dry-run` flag and there are no label changes required, then it produces no output and does not invoke any `gh` command","Given the script is run without the `--dry-run` flag and all label operations succeed, then the existing test suite `scripts/tests/manage_labels.test.mjs` passes"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI includes a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current period",
    "The dashboard displays a summary card showing total users, active sessions, and error rate, each with correct numeric values and appropriate units",
    "The dashboard renders a line chart of daily active users for the past 30 days, with axes labeled and tooltips showing exact counts"
  ]
}

call 1 · 7348 ms · ~2596 → 169 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is described"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI includes a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" and a subtitle describing the current period","The dashboard displays a summary card showing total users, active sessions, and error rate, each with correct numeric values and appropriate units","The dashboard renders a line chart of daily active users for the past 30 days, with axes labeled and tooltips showing exact counts"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is stated"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI must display a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" in a 24px bold font",
    "The dashboard must render a summary chart showing total evaluations per day with bars colored #4CAF50 and labels displayed below each bar",
    "When the dashboard loads, it must complete rendering within 2 seconds on a standard development machine"
  ]
}

call 1 · 700 ms · ~2596 → 154 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is stated"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI must display a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" in a 24px bold font","The dashboard must render a summary chart showing total evaluations per day with bars colored #4CAF50 and labels displayed below each bar","When the dashboard loads, it must complete rendering within 2 seconds on a standard development machine"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 0,
  "blockers": [
    "B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned",
    "W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is described"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The dashboard UI must display a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" in a 24px bold font",
    "The dashboard must render a summary chart showing total evaluations per day, and the chart must load within 1 second for datasets up to 10,000 records",
    "When the dashboard receives an empty dataset, it must display a placeholder message \"No data available\" instead of a chart"
  ]
}

call 1 · 1711 ms · ~2596 → 163 tokens

{"blockers":["B1: No explicit acceptance criteria provided"],"warnings":["W1: Missing technical context – no affected files or components are mentioned","W2: Edge cases not covered – only a vague improvement goal is described"],"score":0,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["The dashboard UI must display a header with the title \"Evaluation Dashboard\" in a 24px bold font","The dashboard must render a summary chart showing total evaluations per day, and the chart must load within 1 second for datasets up to 10,000 records","When the dashboard receives an empty dataset, it must display a placeholder message \"No data available\" instead of a chart"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: Issue does not specify which modules or CI configurations may need updates beyond the mentioned script"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- A network timeout error on POST /labels is retried up to 3 times with the same exponential backoff policy",
    "- A non‑5xx, non‑422 HTTP error (e.g., 400) on POST /labels is not retried and causes the script to abort with a clear error message",
    "- When the label name contains special characters, the retry logic still correctly logs the label name on failure",
    "- The exponential backoff does not exceed 4 seconds between attempts, ensuring CI time limits are respected"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3898 ms · ~2699 → 163 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":["W1: Issue does not specify which modules or CI configurations may need updates beyond the mentioned script"],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["- A network timeout error on POST /labels is retried up to 3 times with the same exponential backoff policy","- A non‑5xx, non‑422 HTTP error (e.g., 400) on POST /labels is not retried and causes the script to abort with a clear error message","- When the label name contains special characters, the retry logic still correctly logs the label name on failure","- The exponential backoff does not exceed 4 seconds between attempts, ensuring CI time limits are respected"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B2: Acceptance criterion \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and vague"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Retry on 502 or 503 responses up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and verify that the total retry duration does not exceed 2 seconds",
    "Do not retry on 422 responses; instead perform a PATCH request and verify that the PATCH is called exactly once",
    "When retries are exhausted, the thrown error must include the label name and the final HTTP status code, and a test must assert this format",
    "Add a unit test that simulates three consecutive 503 responses and asserts that the function retries exactly three times with the correct backoff intervals",
    "Add a performance test that ensures the retry logic completes within the CI timeout threshold (e.g., <5 seconds) for the worst‑case retry scenario"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2042 ms · ~2699 → 220 tokens

{"blockers":["B2: Acceptance criterion \"Retries stay fast enough for CI\" is non‑testable and vague"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["Retry on 502 or 503 responses up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and verify that the total retry duration does not exceed 2 seconds","Do not retry on 422 responses; instead perform a PATCH request and verify that the PATCH is called exactly once","When retries are exhausted, the thrown error must include the label name and the final HTTP status code, and a test must assert this format","Add a unit test that simulates three consecutive 503 responses and asserts that the function retries exactly three times with the correct backoff intervals","Add a performance test that ensures the retry logic completes within the CI timeout threshold (e.g., <5 seconds) for the worst‑case retry scenario"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "Given a 502 response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries the request up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and ultimately fails with an error containing the label name and final status code if all retries fail",
    "Given a 503 response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it follows the same retry logic as for 502 and reports the label name and final status code after exhausting retries",
    "Given a 422 response from GitHub on POST /labels because the label already exists, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry but instead issues a PATCH request to update the label",
    "Given a network timeout or connection error during POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it treats the error as retryable and follows the same exponential backoff policy",
    "Given a rate‑limit (429) response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and surfaces the rate‑limit error immediately"
  ]
}

call 1 · 6559 ms · ~2699 → 272 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["Given a 502 response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it retries the request up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 500 ms and ultimately fails with an error containing the label name and final status code if all retries fail","Given a 503 response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it follows the same retry logic as for 502 and reports the label name and final status code after exhausting retries","Given a 422 response from GitHub on POST /labels because the label already exists, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry but instead issues a PATCH request to update the label","Given a network timeout or connection error during POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it treats the error as retryable and follows the same exponential backoff policy","Given a rate‑limit (429) response from GitHub on POST /labels, when ensureLabel() is called, then it does not retry and surfaces the rate‑limit error immediately"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": true,
  "score": 100,
  "blockers": [],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "The script returns an error and does not retry when the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code",
    "The script validates that the JSON payload includes all required fields (runId, stage, durationMs, outcome) and fails if any are missing or malformed",
    "When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script logs a warning and exits with a non‑zero status code",
    "The script sends exactly one HTTP request per execution, even if multiple stages are present in the run",
    "The script includes a unit test that simulates a 500 response from the ingestion service and asserts that the failure is handled as defined"
  ]
}

call 1 · 2163 ms · ~2663 → 173 tokens

{"blockers":[],"warnings":[],"score":100,"valid":true,"suggested_ac":["The script returns an error and does not retry when the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code","The script validates that the JSON payload includes all required fields (runId, stage, durationMs, outcome) and fails if any are missing or malformed","When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script logs a warning and exits with a non‑zero status code","The script sends exactly one HTTP request per execution, even if multiple stages are present in the run","The script includes a unit test that simulates a 500 response from the ingestion service and asserts that the failure is handled as defined"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The implementation depends on the metrics ingestion service which does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [
    "W1: No reference to the existing implementation details of scripts/metrics-report.mjs beyond its name"
  ],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- [ ] The script returns an error and logs a warning if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code",
    "- [ ] The script retries sending the summary up to 3 times on network failures before giving up",
    "- [ ] When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the summary locally for later retry",
    "- [ ] The JSON payload sent matches the schema exactly, rejecting runs with missing or extra fields",
    "- [ ] The script does not send any data when runId is null or undefined"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3629 ms · ~2663 → 198 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The implementation depends on the metrics ingestion service which does not yet exist and no stub or mock is provided"],"warnings":["W1: No reference to the existing implementation details of scripts/metrics-report.mjs beyond its name"],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- [ ] The script returns an error and logs a warning if the ingestion service responds with a non‑202 status code","- [ ] The script retries sending the summary up to 3 times on network failures before giving up","- [ ] When the ingestion service is unreachable, the script records the summary locally for later retry","- [ ] The JSON payload sent matches the schema exactly, rejecting runs with missing or extra fields","- [ ] The script does not send any data when runId is null or undefined"]}

parsed output

{
  "valid": false,
  "score": 85,
  "blockers": [
    "B4: The issue depends on an external ingestion service that is not yet built and no mock or stub is provided"
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "suggested_ac": [
    "- [ ] The script retries up to 3 times if the ingestion service returns a non‑202 response before failing",
    "- [ ] The script logs an error and continues without crashing when the ingestion service is unreachable (e.g., network error)",
    "- [ ] The JSON payload conforms to the schema: includes numeric `runId`, string `stage`, numeric `durationMs`, and string `outcome` fields",
    "- [ ] The script does not send a summary if any required field is missing, and logs a warning",
    "- [ ] The unit tests verify that a mock ingestion service receiving the payload returns HTTP 202 and that the script handles a 500 response correctly"
  ]
}

call 1 · 3965 ms · ~2663 → 202 tokens

{"blockers":["B4: The issue depends on an external ingestion service that is not yet built and no mock or stub is provided"],"warnings":[],"score":85,"valid":false,"suggested_ac":["- [ ] The script retries up to 3 times if the ingestion service returns a non‑202 response before failing","- [ ] The script logs an error and continues without crashing when the ingestion service is unreachable (e.g., network error)","- [ ] The JSON payload conforms to the schema: includes numeric `runId`, string `stage`, numeric `durationMs`, and string `outcome` fields","- [ ] The script does not send a summary if any required field is missing, and logs a warning","- [ ] The unit tests verify that a mock ingestion service receiving the payload returns HTTP 202 and that the script handles a 500 response correctly"]}